Abstract

BackgroundHuman cancer cell lines are used in research to study the biology of cancer and to test cancer treatments. Recently there are already some large panels of several hundred human cancer cell lines which are characterized with genomic and pharmacological data. The ability to predict drug responses using these pharmacogenomics data can facilitate the development of precision cancer medicines. Although several methods have been developed to address the drug response prediction, there are many challenges in obtaining accurate prediction.MethodsBased on the fact that similar cell lines and similar drugs exhibit similar drug responses, we adopted a similarity-regularized matrix factorization (SRMF) method to predict anticancer drug responses of cell lines using chemical structures of drugs and baseline gene expression levels in cell lines. Specifically, chemical structural similarity of drugs and gene expression profile similarity of cell lines were considered as regularization terms, which were incorporated to the drug response matrix factorization model.ResultsWe first demonstrated the effectiveness of SRMF using a set of simulation data and compared it with two typical similarity-based methods. Furthermore, we applied it to the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) datasets, and performance of SRMF exceeds three state-of-the-art methods. We also applied SRMF to estimate the missing drug response values in the GDSC dataset. Even though SRMF does not specifically model mutation information, it could correctly predict drug-cancer gene associations that are consistent with existing data, and identify novel drug-cancer gene associations that are not found in existing data as well. SRMF can also aid in drug repositioning. The newly predicted drug responses of GDSC dataset suggest that mTOR inhibitor rapamycin was sensitive to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and expression of AK1RC3 and HINT1 may be adjunct markers of cell line sensitivity to rapamycin.ConclusionsOur analysis showed that the proposed data integration method is able to improve the accuracy of prediction of anticancer drug responses in cell lines, and can identify consistent and novel drug-cancer gene associations compared to existing data as well as aid in drug repositioning.

Highlights

  • Human cancer cell lines are used in research to study the biology of cancer and to test cancer treatments

  • The results showed that similarity-regularized matrix factorization (SRMF) performed significantly better than kernelized Bayesian matrix factorization (KBMF) and dual-layer network (DLN) in terms of drug-averaged Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and root mean square error (RMSE)

  • Simulation study we evaluated the performance of SRMF and compared it with KBMF [16] and DLN [17] by applying them to a set of simulated data (Additional file 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human cancer cell lines are used in research to study the biology of cancer and to test cancer treatments. There are already some large panels of several hundred human cancer cell lines which are characterized with genomic and pharmacological data. The ability to predict drug responses using these pharmacogenomics data can facilitate the development of precision cancer medicines. Several large-scale high-throughput screenings have catalogued genomic and pharmacological data for hundreds of human cancer cell lines, respectively [3,4,5,6]. Development of computational methods that link genomic profiles of cancer cell lines to drug responses can facilitate the development of precision cancer medicines, for which the identified genomic biomarkers can be used to predict anticancer drug response [7, 8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.