Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) is a major theoretical tool for the study of defects in semiconductors. However, the results suffer from the often too-small DFT band gap. The calculation of defect formation energy (ΔH) using more sophisticated DFT+GW and hybrid functional methods, however, suggest qualitatively different conclusions about the nature of the DFT error. Here we show that these discrepancies originate from large differences in the representation of the Fermi energy of bulk for the different methods and that they can be largely brought into agreement by correcting the DFT ionization energy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.