Abstract
Effectiveness of natural stimuli (recorded and replayed male vibratory courtship signals) in eliciting a female's vibratory response was compared with that of synthetic stimuli in a plant-dwelling spider (Cupiennius salei). Specifically, the role of interseries (pauses between consecutive male series) was evaluated. Effectiveness was assessed by the number of responding females and the number of responses per female per stimulus. In case of both synthetic and natural stimuli, effectiveness increases with increasing duration of interseries in both measures. Interseries are thus represented in the female's innate releasing mechanism. However, synthetic stimuli are less effective (about 55%) than natural stimuli (set 100%). With decreasing interseries, the number of female responses per unit time sharply increases in case of playback of natural stimuli, but only slightly in case of synthetic stimuli. Since males courting on plants decrease interseries as soon as a female responds, thus facilitating their orientation, the data obtained with natural stimuli much better fit natural male courtship behaviour. This finding brings into question the validity of the synthetic stimulus. In the bioacoustics literature there is neither consensus on the effectiveness of a synthetic stimulus necessary to qualify it for behavioural analysis nor on how to measure effectiveness. We propose three measures : the percentage of responding animals, the action pattern of the response and the number of responses. It may be crucial, particularly when addressing evolutionary questions, to use either natural stimuli or synthetic stimuli (nearly) as effective as natural stimuli to avoid biased sampling of experimental animals and results difficult to interpret in biological terms.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call