Abstract

Deviant stimuli, violating regularities in a sensory environment, elicit the mismatch negativity (MMN), largely described in the Event-Related Potential literature. While it is widely accepted that the MMN reflects more than basic change detection, a comprehensive description of mental processes modulating this response is still lacking. Within the framework of predictive coding, deviance processing is part of an inference process where prediction errors (the mismatch between incoming sensations and predictions established through experience) are minimized. In this view, the MMN is a measure of prediction error, which yields specific expectations regarding its modulations by various experimental factors. In particular, it predicts that the MMN should decrease as the occurrence of a deviance becomes more predictable. We conducted a passive oddball EEG study and manipulated the predictability of sound sequences by means of different temporal structures. Importantly, our design allows comparing mismatch responses elicited by predictable and unpredictable violations of a simple repetition rule and therefore departs from previous studies that investigate violations of different time-scale regularities. We observed a decrease of the MMN with predictability and interestingly, a similar effect at earlier latencies, within 70 ms after deviance onset. Following these pre-attentive responses, a reduced P3a was measured in the case of predictable deviants. We conclude that early and late deviance responses reflect prediction errors, triggering belief updating within the auditory hierarchy. Beside, in this passive study, such perceptual inference appears to be modulated by higher-level implicit learning of sequence statistical structures. Our findings argue for a hierarchical model of auditory processing where predictive coding enables implicit extraction of environmental regularities.

Highlights

  • Oddball paradigms involve sequences of a repeating pattern that sets up a regular environment, and infrequent stimuli, which violate this regularity and subsequently elicit mismatch responses in the brain

  • Post-experimental debriefing with the 22 participants whose data were retained for statistical analysis (11 female, mean age: 25 ± 5 years, ranging from 18 to 35) revealed that 15 of them noticed that sounds could take different intensities, 12 noticed that sounds could take different frequencies and nine noticed that some sounds were less frequent than others

  • The recent prediction error model of the mismatch negativity (MMN) yields new expectations regarding its modulations by specific experimental factors, and one of them, sequence predictability, was employed here to refine our understanding of deviance processing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oddball paradigms involve sequences of a repeating (standard) pattern that sets up a regular environment, and infrequent (deviant) stimuli, which violate this regularity and subsequently elicit mismatch responses in the brain. We were interested in recent theories based on a predictive coding scheme that have been proposed to account for the generation of the MMN (Friston, 2005) [see Winkler and Czigler (2012) for a review of findings compatible with this account] These theories rest upon a hierarchical organization of the brain, wherein predictions regarding incoming inputs are conveyed to lower levels by topdown messages, while bottom-up prediction errors reflecting mismatch between observations and predictions are sent back to higher levels. The MMN reflects a prediction error that triggers the update of predictions by means of messagepassing between the different levels of the auditory hierarchy (Friston, 2005)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call