Abstract

The protection of landscape is a matter of priority in this Anthropocene epoch, as explained in Chap. 25. If we agree that humanity has become the dominant driver of environmental change then figuring out the intellectual and social relevance of geomorphology is a topic that requires equally urgent attention. Classical geomorphology pays scant attention to the social, cultural and political factors that provoke geomorphic change. A modest proposal to recast geomorphology as both a landscape science and a geoscience is a suggested preferred first step. If that step is taken, the contested status of ‘landscape’ will make broader philosophical and methodological approaches possible in geomorphology. In particular, both the intrinsic and utilitarian value of geomorphology could be assessed more realistically. The net result could be more careful consideration of human well-being in geomorphological research.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call