Abstract
The protection of landscape is a matter of priority in this Anthropocene epoch, as explained in Chap. 25. If we agree that humanity has become the dominant driver of environmental change then figuring out the intellectual and social relevance of geomorphology is a topic that requires equally urgent attention. Classical geomorphology pays scant attention to the social, cultural and political factors that provoke geomorphic change. A modest proposal to recast geomorphology as both a landscape science and a geoscience is a suggested preferred first step. If that step is taken, the contested status of ‘landscape’ will make broader philosophical and methodological approaches possible in geomorphology. In particular, both the intrinsic and utilitarian value of geomorphology could be assessed more realistically. The net result could be more careful consideration of human well-being in geomorphological research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
