Plagues and peoples revisited. Basic and strategic research for ingectious disease control at the intergace in the life, health and social sciences.

Abstract

Science & Society9 May 2003free access Plagues and peoples revisited Basic and strategic research for infectious disease control at the interface of the life, health and social sciences Johannes Sommerfeld Johannes Sommerfeld Steering Committee for Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research, Basic and Strategic Research Unit (STR), Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland Search for more papers by this author Johannes Sommerfeld Johannes Sommerfeld Steering Committee for Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research, Basic and Strategic Research Unit (STR), Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland Search for more papers by this author Author Information Johannes Sommerfeld1 1Steering Committee for Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research, Basic and Strategic Research Unit (STR), Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland EMBO Reports (2003)4:S32-S34https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.embor845 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info Twenty-five years after historian William McNeill's landmark publication Plagues and Peoples (McNeill, 1976) examined the impact of infectious diseases throughout the ages, it is clear that these scourges have not been relegated to the history books. Contrary to hopes and assumptions spawned by the dawn of the antibiotic era, infectious diseases are still lurking among us and are resurging at an alarming rate. Plagues and people are, and remain, inextricably linked. Tropical diseases used to be studied in isolation, but social, economic, cultural and political factors are emerging as major contributors to their success. It is now acceptable to argue that such diverse events as ecosystem change and urbanization, as well as poverty, inequality, gender relations and many other factors, are decisive issues in the transmission of infectious diseases, and that epidemics are both social and biological events. This article presents an overview of an infectious disease research agenda at the interface of the life and social sciences and of some of the current initiatives within the World Health Organization (WHO)'s Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR). There is indeed a growing awareness of the interrelations between biotic and social factors in the emergence and persistence of infectious diseases. Molecular events such as the acquisition of multidrug resistance are clearly induced by social factors (Farmer et al., 2001). At the other side of the spectrum, bioterrorism not only has potentially catastrophic biological consequences but is also the result of complex social, economic and political dynamics. Over the past decade, several attempts have been made to link biotic and social domains in health and infectious disease research (Wilson et al., 1994), and different umbrella notions have been used to characterize such a perspective, such as eco-social (Levins & Lopez, 1999; Krieger, 2001), bio-social (Farmer, 1999; Farmer et al., 2001; Farmer & Becerra, 2001) or ecosystem-to-health (Waltner-Toews, 2001) approaches. Whatever the terminology, it leads to a shift from social science research being a ‘handmaiden’ (McKinlay, 1998) for biomedical, downstream (micro-level) interventions to a model in which health-related social science research informs future policies through multi-level, contextualized research (for example, see Ogden, 2000). Leading textbooks in tropical medicine and public health have already noted this shift, and have adapted their contents appropriately. In the recently published 21st edition, 105 years after the first publication, Manson's Tropical Diseases contains a whole section entitled “Underlying factors in tropical medicine”, which includes chapters on primary care, the epidemiology of disease, traditional medicine, genetics, immunology, economics and ethics (Cook & Zumla, 2003). This update reflects the contemporary debate surrounding a conceptual shift from research on disease—the pathogenic paradigm—to research on health—the salutogenic paradigm (see Porter et al., 1999). Concurrently, there is a shift towards upstream (macro) levels of disease analysis that examine the broader context of infectious diseases, their persistence and re-emergence, and focuses on such forces as macro-economic, social and political change, social inequalities and conflict. These are, to a large extent, transnational, and are central to the transmission dynamics of infectious disease, in which macro-social forces act on micro-level outcomes (Farmer, 1999). Traditionally, social, economic, socio-economic, political, political–economic, behavioural and cultural factors have been dealt with in social science subdisciplines such as medical anthropology, medical sociology, health economics, medical geography or the political economy of health, without any cross-disciplinary links to the life sciences. But such social, economic and behavioural (SEB) research can be useful at various levels of the disease control spectrum. At a basic scientific level, it illuminates social, economic and political contingencies that make certain social groups more vulnerable than others, and highlights the extent to which various forms of inequality magnify these vulnerabilities and how these affect the patterns of the spread of disease in specific contexts. Through multi-site comparative research, SEB is able to define health-care approaches that are better suited to bridging the access gap in terms of horizontal and vertical equity and to elucidating the impact of macro-political and macro-economic processes, such as structural adjustment policies, health-sector reform and global health initiatives to control infectious diseases. Plagues and people are, and remain, inextricably linked At the disease level, SEB research can identify bottlenecks in health services and suggest pathways for the more efficient distribution of antimicrobial therapies. It can suggest policies to reduce the access barrier of cost for the most vulnerable groups, such as women, children and the very poor, and can elucidate social and economic forces that affect biological events such as drug resistance. These include inadequate health services and suboptimal drug supply mechanisms, combined with non-adherence to treatment schedules and falsification of pharmaceutical products. Furthermore, SEB research can illuminate inequalities in relationships between men and women that increase the vulnerability of women to poverty and infectious diseases, such as AIDS and tuberculosis (TB), and can be used to formulate gender-specific approaches to disease control. At a conceptual level, SEB research can investigate new approaches for public health action, which are sorely needed. Current efforts are grounded in a certain way of thinking and talking about the health of the public. Basic notions such as ‘risk group’, ‘patient compliance’ and ‘community’ may not grasp the social, cultural and economic reality of marginalized populations. SEB research helps to deconstruct these notions and develops new modes of thinking about the health of the public. New knowledge and new research are clearly essential to enhance diagnostics, vaccines, pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Many of the tools for infectious-disease control that are now under development, such as genetically modified disease vectors, diagnostic tests, drugs and vaccines, have ethical, legal, social and economic implications. The development of these tools is not an autonomous process, but is moulded by diverse factors, such as national or international regulation, social acceptance, knowledge, understanding and perception of risk, and ethical considerations for distribution. Historically grounded social studies of science can be illuminating and informative, for example, on the social context of molecular biology (Abir-Am, 2001; Lynch, 2002), before such new methods of control are introduced. Even so, it is often not the lack of tools but the lack of an appropriate health infrastructure and implementation capacity that handicaps disease control. In this regard, we need to advance trans-disciplinary research. Indeed, this paradigm shift is embodied in a chapter of Manson's Tropical Diseases entitled “Ethics and tropical diseases: some global considerations.” It is a plea for trans-disciplinary research that is usually unheard of in textbooks on tropical medicine: “developing solutions to tropical diseases requires trans-disciplinary attention to the social conditions that determine the burden of tropical diseases that science and medicine alone cannot address” (Benatar, 2003). Trans-disciplinary research has been defined as the “process of synthesizing diverse fields of knowledge in the quest for a creative understanding of the problem”, and the health–social sciences as “transdisciplinary application of social and behavioural science theories and methods, in active partnership with complementary knowledge from biomedical and health sciences (including epidemiology and biostatistics) to gain a comprehensive understanding of a health problem” (Higginbotham et al., 2001). But it is not yet clear what conditions are needed for such a paradigm shift in health research to ensure that new knowledge will be generated in a context of application and not necessarily be confined to the limits and divisions of labour of university-based and disciplinary modes of inquiry (van Manen, 2001). Nevertheless, the TDR, as part of the WHO's Programme on Communicable Diseases, is committed to pursuing this innovative paradigm shift and offers unique opportunities for trans-disciplinary research into African trypanosomiasis, Chagas disease, dengue fever, lymphatic filariasis, leishmaniasis, leprosy, malaria, onchocerciasis, schistosomiasis and TB. TDR's Basic and Strategic Research (STR) unit focuses on the biological, social, economic and behavioural determinants, health systems and other factors of importance for the effective control of infectious diseases. Contrary to current academic divisions of labour, the unit regroups the following three steering committees under the umbrella of basic and strategic research. …it is often not the lack of tools but the lack of an appropriate health infrastructure and implementation capacity that handicaps disease control The Steering Committee for Social, Economic and Behavioural Research (SEB) is based on the premise that despite significant global efforts over the past 50 years, communicable diseases continue to obstruct social and economic development in developing countries, and disproportionately affect the poorest and most marginalized populations. A better understanding of how social, behavioural, political, economic and health system factors operate to affect disease patterns and disease control efforts is considered important for identifying future needs, opportunities and innovations for the improved control of TDR diseases. The SEB Committee aims at strengthening social research along the lines mentioned above. The Steering Committee for Pathogenesis and Applied Genomics (PAG) promotes novel approaches that take advantage of recent advances in molecular biology, immunology, gene technology and genomic structure in elucidating important host–parasite/virus relationships. In addition, the Committee supports and participates in organizing training workshops in bioinformatics and applied genomics for investigators in disease-endemic countries, with support for regional training centres in Africa, Asia and Latin America. The Committee places emphasis on the use of advances in functional genomics in understanding the mechanisms leading to clinical disease in hosts and those essential for the survival of parasites or viruses. The challenge of infectious-disease control falls between the biotic and social levels of reality The Committee for Molecular Entomology (BCV) focuses its activities on malaria and dengue research. Its long-term goal is to develop tools to replace the natural mosquito vectors in the wild with genetically modified mosquitoes that are unable to transfer the malaria parasite or dengue virus. The technical feasibility of genetically transforming mosquitoes has been shown recently with Anopheles stephensi, which was made refractory to the growth and transmission of Plasmodium berghei (Ito et al., 2002), and with Aedes aegypti, which was made resistant to the replication and transmission of the DEN-2 virus (Olson et al., 1996). However, biotechnological challenges, such as devising suitable gene driver systems and developing and evaluating appropriate effector gene constructs, still need to be addressed. Moreover, there is also the need to predict the ethical, legal and social implications of this new biotechnology and its transfer into disease-endemic countries, notably issues related to public perception and acceptability, and also to demonstrate proof of efficacy and safety for humans and the environment as bases for deciding policies (Macer, 2003). Activities bridging the life sciences and the social sciences within STR-driven research currently include a portfolio examining the ethical, legal and social issues in biotechnology transfer and a research initiative into the social and economic forces that influence the emergence and transmission of drug-resistant TB. Potential future research areas now being explored include the ethical, legal and social issues of recombinant DNA vaccines and their transfer into resource-poor settings, the public understanding of pathogen genomics, the societal benefits of or harm caused by genetic information, intellectual property rights, the eco-bio-social dynamics of Chagas’ disease and malaria resurgence in the Amazon, and genome-research issues in resource-poor settings. The challenge of infectious disease control falls between the biotic and social levels of reality; the analysis needs to be comprehensive and holistic and can be called biosocial or eco-bio-social. The TDR Programme, with its unit for Basic and Strategic Research, is committed to furthering this task. Biography Johannes Sommerfeld is the Manager of the Steering Committee for Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research, Basic and Strategic Research Unit (STR), Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] References Abir-Am P.G. (2001) Molecular biology in the context of British, French, and American cultures. Int. Soc. Sci. J., 53, 187–199.Wiley Online LibraryWeb of Science®Google Scholar Benatar S.R. (2003) in Manson's Tropical Diseases 21st edn (eds Cook, G.C. & Zumla, A.I.), 85–93. Saunders, London, UK.Google Scholar Cook G.C. & Zumla A.I. (eds) (2003) Manson's Tropical Diseases 21st edn. Saunders, London, UK.Google Scholar Farmer P. (1999) Infections and Inequalities: The Modern Plagues. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.Google Scholar Farmer P., Bayona J. & Becerra M. (2001) Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and the need for biosocial perspectives. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis., 5, 1–2.Google Scholar Farmer P. & Becerra M. (2001) Biosocial research and the TDR agenda. TDR News, 66, 5–7.Google Scholar Higginbotham N., Albrecht G. & Connor L. (2001) Health Social Science: A Transdisciplinarity and Complexity Perspective. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar Ito J., Ghosh A., Moreira L.A., Wimmer E.A. & Jacobs-Lorena M. (2002) Transgenic anopheline mosquitoes impaired in transmission of a malaria parasite. Nature, 417, 452–455.CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Krieger N. (2001) Theories for social epidemiology in the 21st century: an ecosocial perspective. Int. J. Epidemiol., 30, 668–677.CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Levins R. & Lopez C. (1999) Toward an eco-social view of health. Int. J. Health Serv., 29, 261–293.CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Lynch M. (2002) Protocols, practices, and the reproduction of technique in molecular biology. Br. J. Sociol., 53, 203–220.Wiley Online LibraryPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Macer D. (2003) Ethical, legal and social issues of genetically modified disease vectors in public health. (Special Topics in Social, Economic and Behavioural (SEB) Research No. 1.) WHO, Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar McKinlay J.B. (1998) Paradigmatic obstacles to improving the health of populations — implications for health policy. Salud Publica Méx., 40, 369–379.CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar McNeill W.H. (1976) Plagues and Peoples. Anchor Books, New York, USA.Google Scholar Ogden J. (2000) Improving tuberculosis control — social science inputs. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg., 94, 135–140.CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Olson K.E. et al. (1996) Genetically-engineered resistance to Dengue-2 virus transmission in mosquitoes. Science, 272, 884–886.CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Porter J., Ogden J. & Pronyk P. (1999) Infectious disease policy: towards the production of health. Health Policy Plann., 14, 322–328.CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar van Manen M. (2001) Transdisciplinarity and the new production of knowledge. Qual. Health Res., 11, 850–852.CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Waltner-Toews D. (2001) An ecosystem approach to health and its applications to tropical and emerging diseases. Cadernos Saude Publica, 17 ( suppl.), 7–36.CrossrefGoogle Scholar Wilson M.E., Levins R. & Spielman A. (1994) Disease in evolution: global changes and emergence of infectious diseases. Ann. NY Acad. Sci., 740, December 15 issue.Google Scholar Previous ArticleNext Article Volume 4Issue S11 June 2003In this issue ReferencesRelatedDetailsLoading ...