Abstract

This paper sketches the implications of the competitive neutrality principle for competition agencies. The discussion is framed in a process perspective (I). The paper opens with a review of the core enforcement scenarios where a State-related firm is defendant (II) or complainant (III) in competition proceedings. It then addresses the situation in which the State is a third party to competition proceedings (IV). The paper in turn discusses theoretical de-biasing options for competitive neutrality-minded competition agencies (V). It goes on to reflect on the non-core advocacy missions of competition agencies (VI). To finish, the paper closes with words of warning (VII). A strict interpretation of the competitive neutrality principle in competition proceedings could limit agency discretion and divorce their work from the big economic picture.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call