Abstract

27 Background: Oncologists engage in emotionally charged conversations with patients and families about prognosis, goals of care, and end of life transitions. Many oncologists lack key skills for guiding patients through such conversations. Key skills include posing open ended questions to elicit the patient’s perspective, using silence effectively, and responding to emotion with empathy. We previously described a communication skills curriculum for first year medical oncology fellows consisting of a series of one hour monthly seminars (Epner and Baile, Academic Medicine, 2014). We now describe improvements in the curriculum based on extensive feedback from learners and teaching assistants. Methods: Anonymous feedback from first year fellows indicated longer sessions would allow for sufficient warm up and more in depth reflection and opportunity to practice. We therefore consolidated the sessions into quarterly 4 hour workshops. Several fellows also expressed discomfort with participating in role play of clinical scenarios in front of colleagues, so we implemented small group learning in which 3-4 fellows practiced communication skills in facilitated role play scenarios. We also replaced large group role play with narrative medicine techniques, such as reading and discussing medically-themed short stories and reflective writing exercises to allow the greatest amount of participation among learners. Results: Fellows completed anonymous surveys on which they rated items on a 4 point scale, with 1 being best and 4 worst. The average score of the two survey items pertaining to large group role play was 2.6. After changes in the curriculum, items pertaining to narrative medicine averaged 1.3, which was very favorable. Items pertaining to relevance and value of the curriculum also averaged less than 1.5 for all years. Attendance was 100% with the exception of fellows who were on vacation. Conclusions: Learner-centered, interactive innovations to our previous communication skills curriculum were highly rated by fellows and addressed issues of enhanced participation in a learning environment in which fellows felt safe to actively participate, reflect, and interact extensively with their peers.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call