Implementation of Customary Court Policy in Parigi Moutong Regency

Abstract

This study focuses on 1 (one) problem formulation: How is the Implementation of Customary Court Policy in Parigi Moutong? The theory used is the theory of Policy Implementation Thomas B Smith, using 4 (four) factors, namely, (1) Idealized policy, (2) Target group, (3) Implementing organization, (4) Environmental factor. This research uses qualitative research methods with observation, interviews, and documentation data collection techniques. Snowball determination of informants. Miles, Huberman, and Saldana interactive data analysis, including data collection, condensation, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The study results show that implementing the Customary Court Policy in Parigi Moutong Regency has been running, but it has not been effective. Even in some villages and sub-districts, it is getting weaker and forgotten. Factors causing the ineffectiveness of policy implementation: inaccurate and consistent communication, both internally and externally, the implementing organization is not supported by an excellent organizational structure and sufficient corporate resources, Social, economic, and political environment is not supportive. The Central Sulawesi Governor’s Regulation No. 42 of 2013, concerning Guidelines for Customary Courts in Central Sulawesi, should be a policy that encourages and directs customary stakeholders but has not been used as a guideline and reference in implementing the traditional justice process.