Abstract
BackgroundChecklists are common in some medical fields, including surgery, intensive care and emergency medicine. They can be an effective tool to improve care processes and reduce mortality and morbidity. Despite the seemingly rapid acceptance and dissemination of the checklist, there are few studies describing the actual process of developing and implementing such tools in health care. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences from checklist development and implementation in a group of non-medical, high reliability organisations (HROs).MethodA qualitative study based on key informant interviews and field visits followed by a Delphi approach. Eight informants, each with 10-30 years of checklist experience, were recruited from six different HROs.ResultsThe interviews generated 84 assertions and recommendations for checklist implementation. To achieve checklist acceptance and compliance, there must be a predefined need for which a checklist is considered a well suited solution. The end-users ("sharp-end") are the key stakeholders throughout the development and implementation process. Proximity and ownership must be assured through a thorough and wise process. All informants underlined the importance of short, self-developed, and operationally-suited checklists. Simulation is a valuable and widely used method for training, revision, and validation.ConclusionChecklists have been a cornerstone of safety management in HROs for nearly a century, and are becoming increasingly popular in medicine. Acceptance and compliance are crucial for checklist implementation in health care. Experiences from HROs may provide valuable input to checklist implementation in healthcare.
Highlights
It has been said that while medicine used to be inefficient, simple, and safe it is effective, highly complex, and dangerous [1]
Checklists have been a cornerstone of safety management in High reliability organisations (HRO) for nearly a century, and are becoming increasingly popular in medicine
Acceptance and compliance are crucial for checklist implementation in health care
Summary
It has been said that while medicine used to be inefficient, simple, and safe it is effective, highly complex, and dangerous [1]. Realising how prone we as humans are for short term memory loss, it is striking how many potentially dangerous medical procedures are based on perfect memory [5] In this context, it is rather strange that checklists are not used more often in medicine. Checklists are common in some medical fields, and can be an effective tool to improve care processes and reduce mortality and morbidity [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Checklists are common in some medical fields, including surgery, intensive care and emergency medicine. They can be an effective tool to improve care processes and reduce mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences from checklist development and implementation in a group of non-medical, high reliability organisations (HROs)
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have