Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the priority order of the criteria, sub- criteria, then determine which suppliers CV SL company can choose. The population in this study is the decision maker and management of CV SL.The sampling technique used was purposive sampling in order to obtain 7 people. The data analysis technique in this study used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), while the analytical tool used was expert choice 11. The results of the analysis of this study obtained the importance weight of the criteria with the first priority is quality (0.34), price (0.26) , availability (0.15), delivery (0.12), performance history (0.07), warranty & complaint service (0.06). Meanwhile, the results of the assessment of the importance of alternatives in supplier selection show that the LN supplier (0.0786) has the highest weight, the two IS suppliers (0.0760), the three MJ suppliers (0.0733), the four TL suppliers (0.0711), the fifth supplier FI (0.0703), the sixth supplier LM (0.0684). The results of this calculation can be used by the company as a consideration in determining the next supplier selection policy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JMBI UNSRAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi).
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
