Abstract

The nursing students of Grade 2009 to Grade 2016 were selected. Their skills, midterm, usual and final performances as well as comprehensive scores of normal human morphology course were analyzed by one-way ANOVA in combination with different stages of curriculum integration in order to compare the teaching effect between traditional teaching mode + evaluation system and mixed teaching mode + formative evaluation in the course of normal human morphology. Statistical analysis by SPSS 17.0 showed that the average score of formation stage (traditional teaching mode) was 67.55 ± 12.72, the average score of integration stage (mixed teaching mode) was 72.79 ± 10.93 and the average score of development stage (formative evaluation +mixed teaching mode) was 83.94 ± 9.58. After making comparisons, the P values of ANOVA of the course of normal human body morphology in all stages were all less than 0.001, having statis - tical significance. The results showed that the overall development of the curriculum is becoming mature and the new teaching model can help students who usually do not like to review. Key words: Normal human morphology; Mixed teaching mode; Formative evaluation

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call