Abstract
Abstract In this article, the author discusses the paradox between the fundamentality of arbitrator impartiality and independence and the fluidity of the applicable norms. These norms differ over time and place, and vary depending on the type of arbitration, the stage of the proceedings and the applicable rules and laws. While standards applicable to judges have some relevance for this discussion, they cannot be equated with the standards for arbitrators. The recent English Supreme Court decision in Halliburton v Chubb is used to illustrate various aspects of the discussion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
