Abstract

AbstractChina's environmental protection tax (EPT) has been implemented since the beginning of 2018 to control environmental issues (e.g., air pollution). The current EPT law indicates that tax revenues are given to provincial governments without return. However, tax revenue redistribution is the key to achieving a so‐called “double dividend”; that is, an environmental tax could benefit both the environment and economic efficiency. Based on our previous analysis of the effectiveness of the current EPT, we further explore whether the double dividend could be achieved under different tax reforms based on the multiregion and multisectoral computable general equilibrium model. We find that recycling the EPT revenue to reduce household income tax (EPT_Int) is an efficient way to achieve the double dividend, and there is no double dividend if the EPT revenue is compensated by reducing enterprise income tax (EPT_Ent) or by investing in solar power (EPT_Sol). Combining EPT_Int and EPT_Sol could be a better approach if more air pollution emissions reductions are required to achieve the national reduction targets. At the provincial level, recycling the EPT revenues to reduce household income tax could offset the negative effect of environmental tax on the economy and achieve the double dividend in all provinces, especially the provinces with higher emission intensity, such as Shanxi, Hebei, Inner Mongolia, and Guizhou Provinces. This result shows that provinces with high emission intensity may further reduce air pollutant emissions during the post‐EPT era.

Highlights

  • China's environmental protection tax (EPT) law took effect on 1st January 2018 to control the environmental issues in China

  • We find that recycling the EPT revenue to reduce household income tax (EPT_Int) is an efficient way to achieve the double dividend, and there is no double dividend if the EPT revenue is compensated by reducing enterprise income tax (EPT_Ent) or by investing in solar power (EPT_Sol)

  • Combining the effects of both national gross domestic product (GDP) and air pollutant emissions, we find that enhancing the EPT to the highest rates and returning EPT revenues to reduce the household income tax is the best among the six scenarios proposed in this study because it causes relatively smaller GDP losses but more reductions in air pollutant emissions compared to all other scenarios

Read more

Summary

Introduction

China's environmental protection tax (EPT) law took effect on 1st January 2018 to control the environmental issues in China. Returning the tax revenues to reduce other distortionary taxes or transferring the revenue to other agents might offset the adverse influence on the GDP and offer additional benefits to both the environment and economy (Andrew & Benoit, 2001). In the second dividend ( called the revenue effect), the revenues collected by the environmental taxes are used to reduce other distortionary taxes so that to improve economic efficiency (Bor & Huang, 2010). The weak double dividend occurs when welfare increased by using environmental tax revenues to lower distorting taxes is greater than the welfare increased by returning the revenues in a lump‐sum fashion. The weak double dividend should compare two recycling policies, and the strong form just compare a single policy to the tax revenues without recycling (Bovenberg, 1999)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call