Abstract

Both economic development level and environmental factors have significant impacts on life expectancy at birth (LE). This paper takes LE as the research object and selects nine economic and environmental indicators with various impacts on LE. Based on a dataset of economic and environmental indicators of 20 countries from 2004 to 2016, our research uses the Pearson Correlation Coefficient to evaluate the correlation coefficients between the indicators, and we use multiple regression models to measure the impact of each indicator on LE. Based on the results from models and calculations, this study conducts a comparative analysis of the influencing mechanisms of different indicators on LE in both developed and developing countries, with conclusions as follow: (1) GDP per capita and the percentage of forest area to land area have a positive impact on LE in developed countries; however, they have a negative impact on LE in developing countries. Total public expenditure on education as a percentage of GDP and fertilizer consumption have a negative impact on LE in developed countries; however, they have a positive impact on LE in developing countries. Gini coefficient and average annual exposure to PM2.5 have no significant effect on LE in developed countries; however, they have a negative impact on LE in developing countries. Current healthcare expenditures per capita have a negative impact on LE in developed countries, and there is no significant impact on LE in developing countries. (2) The urbanization rate has a significant positive impact on LE in both developed countries and developing countries. Carbon dioxide emissions have a negative impact on LE in both developed and developing countries. (3) In developed countries, GDP per capita has the greatest positive impact on LE, while fertilizer consumption has the greatest negative impact on LE. In developing countries, the urbanization rate has the greatest positive impact on LE, while the Gini coefficient has the greatest negative impact on LE. To improve and prolong LE, it is suggested that countries should prioritize increasing GDP per capita and urbanization level. At the same time, countries should also work on reducing the Gini coefficient and formulating appropriate healthcare and education policies. On the other hand, countries should balance between economic development and environmental protection, putting the emphasis more on environmental protection, reducing environmental pollution, and improving the environment’s ability of self-purification.

Highlights

  • Health is considered as “one of the fundamental rights of human beings” by theWorld Health Organization (WHO)

  • This paper uses multiple regression models and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient to explore the relationship between multiple environment and economic variables on life expectancy and provide more support for future research, and as a basis for making recommendations for countries to improve life expectancy at birth (LE) in order to achieve the sustainable development of human society

  • Significant negative correlations have been found between LE per capita and current healthcare expenditures per capita (Coefficient = −0.923, p = 0.001), CO2 emissions (Coefficient = −0.825, p = 0.001), fertilizer consumption (Coefficient = −1.036, p = 0.001), and total public expenditures on education as a percentage of GDP (Coefficient = −0.174, p = 0.007)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper argues that it is necessary to study the differences in the impacts from the level of economic development and environmental factors on life expectancy in both developed countries and developing countries. By studying the differences in life expectancy between developed countries and developing countries, it will help the United Nations to improve its ongoing work on the promotion of human health and the assistance of mankind. It will be helpful for various national governments to formulate more effective strategies to prolong life expectancy, to improve the quality of life, and to strike a balance between economic development and environmental protection. All countries should join together to actively promote sustainable economic development, to jointly tackle environmental pollution and global climate change, to create a community of a shared future for mankind, and to achieve the health, longevity, and sustainable development of mankind

Study on the Factors That Affect Life Expectancy
Research on the Impact from Economic Development Level on Life Expectancy
Study on the Impact from Environmental Factors on Life Expectancy
Research on Regional Differences in Life Expectancy
Methods Review
Summary
Hypothesizes
Sample Selection
Data Sources
Design Methods
Result
Discussion
Findings
Conclusions
Limitations and Outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call