Abstract

Abstract Introduction Cardiogenic shock is associated with high in-hospital morbidity and mortality. Every hospital should take all possible measures to reduce it. Methods Quasi-experimental study in patients with cardiogenic shock comparing two periods: A period of a cardiogenic shock programme including the establishment of a multidisciplinary team (shock team), early alert to the transplant hospital, initiation of a VA ECMO programme and extension of continuous care by acute cardiovascular care specialist, and a previous period without the mentioned measures. The primary objective was whether there were differences in in-hospital mortality and mortality at follow-up. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were examined as a secondary objective. Results A total of 139 patients were enrolled, including 69 in the previous period and 70 in the cardiogenic shock programme period. There was a significant reduction in-hospital mortality (55.1% vs. 37.1%, p=0-03) and in the follow-up (62.7% vs. 44.6%, p=0.03) in the second period. Diabetes mellitus, ejection fraction, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and implementation of the cardiogenic shock programme were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusions Implementing a comprehensive cardiogenic shock programme in a non-transplanting hospital improved in-hospital and follow-up mortality of patients in cardiogenic shock.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.