Abstract
The interactive smart board has made the developing system more innovative and sensible.The main goals of the review were to determine the effects of the interactive smart board on science learning among low achievers in school, interactive smart board on science learning among high achiever students in school, and to compare how science students do when using a smart board rather than the traditional whiteboard. There is no significant difference in low achiever and high achiever students in learning science when using an interactive smart board; there is no significant difference in low achiever and high achiever students in learning science when using a traditional whiteboard. A pre-test and post-test control group design was used. There were 66 students, and the control and experimental groups were selected using a random assignment. A 30-item test was created and administered as a pre-test and post-test. The analysis provided concrete evidence that the interactive smart board was superior to the conventional whiteboard for the learning and development experience.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
