Abstract

BackgroundRecent evidence suggests a potentially protective effect of increasing ketone body availability via accepting low macronutrient intake early after onset of critical illness. The impact of blood glucose control with insulin on circulating ketones is unclear. Whereas lowering blood glucose may activate ketogenesis, high insulin concentrations may have the opposite effect. We hypothesized that the previously reported protective effects of tight glucose control in critically ill patients receiving early parenteral nutrition may have been mediated in part by activation of ketogenesis.MethodsThis is a secondary analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials on tight versus liberal blood glucose control in the intensive care unit, including 700 critically ill children and 2748 critically ill adults. All patients received early parenteral nutrition as part of the contemporary standard of care. Before studying a potential mediator role of circulating ketones in improving outcome, we performed a time course analysis to investigate whether tight glucose control significantly affected ketogenesis and to identify a day of maximal effect, if any. We quantified plasma/serum 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations from intensive care unit admission until day 3 in 2 matched subsets of 100 critically ill children and 100 critically ill adults. Univariable differences between groups were investigated by Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences in 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations between study days were investigated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsIn critically ill children and adults receiving early parenteral nutrition, tight glucose control, as compared with liberal glucose control, lowered mean morning blood glucose on days 1–3 (P < 0.0001) via infusing insulin at a higher dose (P < 0.0001). Throughout the study period, caloric intake was not different between groups. In both children and adults, tight glucose control did not affect 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations, which were suppressed on ICU days 1–3 and significantly lower than the ICU admission values for both groups (P < 0.0001).ConclusionTight versus liberal glucose control in the context of early parenteral nutrition did not affect 3-hydroxybutyrate concentrations in critically ill patients. Hence, the protective effects of tight glucose control in this context cannot be attributed to increased ketone body availability.

Highlights

  • Increasing evidence suggests a potentially protective effect of enhancing ketone availability during critical illness [1]

  • Ketogenesis has traditionally been reported to be blunted in critical illness [5,6,7], a recent pilot crossover randomized controlled trials (RCTs) revealed that four hours of full fasting significantly increased blood ketone concentrations in long-stay critically ill patients [8]

  • We aimed to study whether enhanced ketogenesis could have mediated part of the outcome benefit of tight glucose control seen in the parent RCTs [16,17,18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Increasing evidence suggests a potentially protective effect of enhancing ketone availability during critical illness [1]. Ketogenesis has traditionally been reported to be blunted in critical illness [5,6,7], a recent pilot crossover RCT revealed that four hours of full fasting significantly increased blood ketone concentrations in long-stay critically ill patients [8]. Recent evidence suggests a potentially protective effect of increasing ketone body availability via accepting low macronutrient intake early after onset of critical illness. We hypothesized that the previously reported protective effects of tight glucose control in critically ill patients receiving early parenteral nutrition may have been mediated in part by activation of ketogenesis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call