Abstract

Research background: Many contemporary empirical studies and theories of economic growth have revealed the dependence of innovative development of countries on the adequacy of funding for innovation. However, much of the empirical literature has discussed the issue of innovativeness without assessing the impact of the structure of funding sources on the success of the innovation process. Purpose of the article: The aim of this paper is to prove the hypothesis of the inefficiency of innovative systems in which the proportion of public investment is high compared to private investment. In Russia, the share of public R&D funding is 67%, and the EU average is 33%. Methods: Based on the empirical research, we have compared the EU Horizon 2020 program with Russian VEB Ventures programs, conversion and digitalization programs of the Industrial Development Fund and found out how the structure of funding sources for these programs affects the success of their implementation. Findings & Value added: The results of our research show that a large share of public funding is not the cause, but the result of low private innovation activity and a lack of private investment. Significant reasons for their shortage were identified: the economic feasibility of purchasing ready-made solutions on the global market instead of funding research; cheap labour; adverse business climate. Thus, a high share of public financing of innovations in a country can serve as an indicator of the existence of serious reasons for restraining innovative development.

Highlights

  • A number of works show the defining role of innovations in the life of society

  • A large share of public funding is a forced measure to compensate for insufficient incentives for private investors

  • The analysis of the EU Horizon 2020 program confirms this conclusion by the fact that public participation makes innovation projects more attractive to private capital, as a result of which the share of private investments increases while share of public investment is smaller

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A number of works show the defining role of innovations in the life of society. In the work of Josef Botlík is studied the impact of innovations on socioeconomic structure of the society. He comes to conclusion that innovations have direct impact on behavior of companies and employees. Automatization of processes reduces number of workplaces. Incentives are being created to improve professional skills of employees and to create products with a higher level of additional value [1]. Researches come to conclusion that innovations, unparticular, creative innovation, significantly increase the competitiveness of traditional institutions and create a multiplier effect in the economy [2, 3]. The public is interested in investing in the development of innovation activities

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call