Impact of reduction in antifibrotic treatment on mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Abstract

IntroductionIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a severe interstitial lung disease for which two effective antifibrotics, nintedanib and pirfenidone, are available. However, many patients receive a reduced dosage or pause treatment due to side effects although the impact of antifibrotic treatment reduction is uncertain. MethodsWe retrospectively investigated the impact of antifibrotic treatment reduction on death in a large real-life IPF cohort. The primary endpoint of the analyses was time until death by any cause. Five patient groups were defined based on treatment intensity (full, reduced or no treatment) and the antifibrotic drug type (pirfenidone or nintedanib). Between group survival was compared using Cox proportional hazards analysis adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, and lung function at baseline. Results375 patients from the Danish PFBIO-cohort were followed from April 2016 until November 2021 with a median follow-up time of 1.84 years. Of patients receiving nintedanib and pirfenidone, 80.19% and 67.42% had reduced treatment, respectively, when considering the entire follow-up period.Treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone was associated with improved survival compared to no antifibrotic treatment independent of treatment intensity (nintedanib: HR: 0.31, 95%-CI: 0.19–0.53, p < 0.001 & pirfenidone: HR: 0.26, 95%-CI: 0.16–0.42, p < 0.001). Nintedanib and pirfenidone in lower intensities were not associated with worse survival outcomes. ConclusionA substantial proportion of patients with IPF receive reduced antifibrotic treatment to ameliorate the side effects associated with a full dosage regime. Treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone, independent of treatment intensity, was preferable over no antifibrotic treatment in improving survival and reduced dose appears to be a good alternative if full dose is not tolerated.