Abstract
Since the economic crisis (2008) municipalities became more aware of their real estate portfolio. Their first reaction to the sense of urgency to pay more attention to this extensive property was to improve their real estate administration. Now, ten years later, municipalities are ready to focus more on the professionalization of the management of their real estate. The purpose of this study is to present the role of individual concepts of public management in Polish and Dutch municipal (public) real estate management. The paper is based on the results on survey research based on public real estate management theory and two public management approaches: new public management and good governance. First, preliminary research was carried out in a Polish metropolitan area after which all Polish metropolitan areas where questioned about their real estate management issues. This questionnaire was also sent to all Dutch municipalities one year later. The Hellwig’s taxonomic method was performed on both separately to assess the level of implementation of good governance and new public management principles in real estate management practices. The research shows that new public management standards are applied at a similar level in municipal real estate management in Poland and The Netherlands. Good governance standards are used a little more broadly in Poland than in The Netherlands. The research shows that in Poland and The Netherlands the concepts of new public management and good governance are not applied as a whole but are deployed as a collection of instruments. Most municipalities choose some of these instruments to apply to their municipal real estate (MREM). Both in Poland and in The Netherlands there are differences noticed in the application of new public management and good governance principles depending on the type of municipality. Besides this originality and scientific relevance, municipalities of both countries could benefit from this comparison by learning from best practices. Practical recommendations and suggestions for public administration concern: (i) the necessity to develop municipal real estate management plans; (ii) increase regularity of asset valuation and (iii) assessment of real estate management performance; (iv) greater transparency in real estate management; and (v) increasing the participation of citizens in the process of managing real estate.
Highlights
Due to its size, real estate owned by municipalities is an important segment of the real estate market [1]
As it results from the research both in Poland and in The Netherlands, New Public Management (NPM) standards are applied at a similar level in Municipal Real Estate Management (MREM) (Hellwig’s synthetic measure is 0.329 for Poland and 0.326 for Netherlands—see Table 4)
Research on real estate management based on the principles of NPM and Good Governance (GG) comparing two countries and Poland and The Netherlands has never been done before
Summary
Real estate owned by municipalities is an important segment of the real estate market [1]. Due to the economic crisis that started in 2008, municipalities felt the sense of urgency to take the management of their real estate portfolio more seriously. Their focus was mainly economically on how they could cut costs. This question made the municipalities realize there was much work to do on their administration of their real estate and related themes first. In the field of Corporate Real Estate Management (CREM) This present research is about public non-profit organizations. This and the political context makes real estate management in a municipal context different from real estate management in the for-profit sector
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have