Abstract
To test the hypothesis that a program of regular reading and discussion would result in significant improvement in the surgical database as measured by the American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination (ABSITE), we conducted a 2-year prospective study. The study group, which was comprised of 40 residents, was compared with a control group of 44 residents enrolled in the residency during the 2 years that preceded the study period. Neither reading effort nor discussion group attendance correlated strongly with ABSITE performance among first-year residents. At this level, ABSITE scores correlated best with National Board of Medical Examiners Part I scores (r = 0.699, p = 0.002). In contrast, second-year through fifth-year residents showed a cumulative improvement across the residency (80 versus 180 standard score points, p = 0.048). Individual resident improvement correlated highly with reading effort (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). There was little measurable effect from attending discussion sessions. We conclude that the surgical database can be improved by a program of regular reading and that the magnitude of the improvement is directly proportional to the reading effort.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call