Abstract

PurposeDosimetry of ionizing radiation in the presence of strong magnetic fields is gaining increased relevance in light of advances for MRI‐guided radiation therapy. While the impact of strong magnetic fields on the overall response of ionization chambers has been simulated and measured before, this work investigates the local impact of the magnetic field on dose response in an ion chamber. High‐resolution 1D and 2D response maps have been created for two small clinical thimble ionization chambers, the PinPoint chambers 31006 and 31014 (Physikalisch Technische Werkstaetten Freiburg, Germany).MethodsWorking on the Imaging and Medical Beam Line of the Australian Synchrotron an intense kilovoltage radiation beam with very low divergence, collimated to 0.1 mm was used to scan the chambers by moving them on a 2D motion platform. Measured current and beam position were correlated to create the response maps. Small neodymium magnets were used to create a field of about 0.25 T. Chamber axis, magnetic field, and beam direction were perpendicular to each other. Measurements were performed with both orientations of the magnetic field as well as without it. Chamber biases of 5 and 250 V in both polarities were used.ResultsThe local distribution of the response of small thimble‐type ionization chambers was found to be impacted by a magnetic field. Depending on the orientation of the magnetic field, the chamber response near the stem was either enhanced or reduced with the response near the tip behaving the opposite way. Local changes were in the order of up to 40% compared to measurements without the magnetic field present. Bending of the central electrode was observed for the chamber with the steel electrode. The size of the volume of reduced collection near the guard electrode was impacted by the magnetic field.As the here investigated beam and field parameters differ from those of clinical systems, quantitatively different results would be expected for the latter. However, the gyroradii encountered here were similar to those of a 6–7 MV MRI linac with a 1.5 T magnet.ConclusionsMagnetic fields impact the performance of ionization chambers also on a local level. For practical measurements this might mean a change in the effective point of measurement, in addition to any global corrections. Further knowledge about the local response will help in selecting or constructing optimized chambers for use in magnetic fields.

Highlights

  • Dosimetry of ionizing radiation in the presence of strong magnetic fields has become an area of increased interest with3298 Med

  • This includes the decision of which ionization chamber to use, as well as guidance on how to design an improved detector in order to optimally assess the dose deposited in the patient

  • Using a high-precision 2D motion stage the ion chamber was moved with respect to the beam, rather than the other way around, while the current in the chamber was collected with a Keithley 6517A electrometer (Tektronix, USA) and correlated with the position in the Wiggler magnetic field Filter 1 Filter 2 HVL Beam energy Pinhole diameter

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dosimetry of ionizing radiation in the presence of strong magnetic fields has become an area of increased interest with3298 Med. The impact of strong magnetic fields, such as the static field of an MRI scanner, on the response of ionization chambers globally has been simulated[3–5] and measured[4–8]. The primary goal of this work is to better understand the change in the spatial distribution of charge collection inside an ionization chamber when radiation measurements are made in the presence of a magnetic field. This will hopefully lead to a better approach of measuring radiation dose in MR-guided radiotherapy treatment systems. This includes the decision of which ionization chamber (or possibly other detector) to use, as well as guidance on how to design an improved detector in order to optimally assess the dose deposited in the patient. The presented results can be used to verify Monte Carlo simulations of the same setup, which can be applied in more complex situations and with different beam energies, where measurements are more difficult or impossible

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call