Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the impact of clinical pharmacist (CP) recommendations through a live, primary care-based, medication therapy management (MTM) protocol on low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in patients who have cardiovascular disease (CVD) with standard, chart-review MTM. MethodsPatients with established CVD who were not at their LDL goal were identified and analyzed by either a chart-review MTM service or a live, one-on-one pharmacist–physician MTM service over a 6-month timeframe. For the chart-review MTM service, recommendations were communicated through an electronic medical record (EMR) that the physician and pharmacist had access to. ResultsPrimary outcomes included mean LDL reduction from baseline, number of patients achieving their LDL goal, and percent of implemented CP recommendations. Mean LDL reduction from baseline in the chart-review MTM group and the live MTM group was 36 mg/dL ± 23.2 mg/dL (P = 0.001) and 62 mg/dL ± 28.3 mg/dL (P = 0.001), respectively. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.001). The chart-review MTM group had 30% of patients reach their LDL goal with 66.3% of CP recommendations implemented compared to 51.3% and 86.3% for the same parameters in the live MTM group (P = 0.006 and P = 0.003, respectively). ConclusionAlthough both MTM services provide a significant LDL reduction from baseline in patients with CVD, live MTM provides significantly greater LDL reductions, implemented CP recommendations, and goal attainment than chart-review MTM. Thus, live MTM services are more effective than chart-review MTM services, at least within the clinics that these protocols were assessed for the purposes of this study.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.