Impact of in vivo fate of STING agonist-loaded lipid nanoparticles on antitumor immunity

Abstract

Therapeutically manipulating the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway has promising potential for enhancing antitumor immunity. Agonists of this pathway (STING agonists) are being evaluated in clinical trials. Loading the STING agonists into lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) increases their safety and efficacy. We previously developed STING agonists loaded LNPs consisting of the ionizable lipid YSK12-C4 (YSK12-LNPs), which showed significant antitumor effects. However, it is largely unclear how the in vivo fate of STING agonists loaded LNPs affects the antitumor immune responses. In this study, we compared the YSK12-LNPs with LNPs composed of DLin-MC3-DMA (MC3-LNPs) showing different in vivo fates. Biodistribution and flow cytometry analyses of mouse tissues revealed that the MC3-LNPs delivered higher amounts of STING agonists to the liver than the YSK12-LNPs. Additionally, significantly more liver leukocytes internalized the MC3-LNPs than the YSK12-LNPs. In contrast, the YSK12-LNPs delivered higher amounts of STING agonists to the liver leukocytes than the MC3-LNPs, leading to the effective induction of innate immunity and inflammation in the tumors. However, the antitumor effects in the B16-F10 lung metastasis and CT26 tumor models were comparable. Interestingly, flow cytometry analyses suggested that the YSK12-LNPs were more likely to activate natural killer cells and M1 macrophages, while the MC3-LNPs were more likely to activate CD8+ T cells. Our data suggest that different antitumor immune response mechanisms may operate depending on the characteristics and distribution of the LNPs.