Impact of Handgrip Strength on Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Abstract

The relationship between handgrip strength (HGS) and clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not yet been thoroughly investigated. This was a single-center, observational study. A total of 469 patients who underwent PCI and whose periprocedural HGS was measured were included. Patients were divided into two groups: the low HGS group (men, ＜28 kg; women, ＜18 kg) and the high HGS group (men, ≥ 28 kg; women, ≥ 18 kg). The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), and heart failure readmission. There were 151 patients in the low HGS group and 318 patients in the high HGS group. The age of patients in the low HGS group was significantly higher (median [interquartile range]: 78 [71-82] vs. 70 [61-75] years, p＜0.001), while the body mass index and serum albumin level were significantly lower (body mass index: 22.5 [20.2-24.3] vs. 24.3 [22.3-26.6] kg/m2, p＜0.001; serum albumin: 3.6 [3.1-3.9] vs. 4.0 [3.7-4.3] g/dL, p＜0.001) than those in the high HGS group. During the median follow-up period of 778 days, the low HGS group had a higher incidence of composite endpoint than the high HGS group (p＜0.001). The low HGS group had a higher risk of all-cause, cardiac, and non-cardiac death (p＜0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that low handgrip strength was an independent predictor for the composite endpoint (hazard ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.04-3.12, p=0.04). Low HGS was independently associated with adverse outcomes after PCI.