Abstract

Conceptual and applied studies assessing the linkage between economic freedom and corruption expect that economic freedom boosts economic growth, improves income, and reduces levels of corruption. However, most of them have concentrated on developed and developing groups, while the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries have drawn much less attention. Empirical findings are most often conflicting. Moreover, previous studies performed rather simple frequentist techniques regressing one or some freedom indices on corruption that do not allow for grasping all the aspects of economic freedom as well as capturing variations across countries. The study aims to investigate the effects of ten components of economic freedom index on the level of corruption in ten ASEAN countries from 1999 to 2018. By applying a Bayesian hierarchical mixed-effects regression via a Monte Carlo technique combined with the Gibbs sampler, the obtained results suggest several findings as follows: (i) In view of probability, the predictors property rights, government integrity, tax burden, business freedom, labor freedom, and investment freedom have a strongly positive impact on the response perceived corruption index; (ii) Government spending, trade freedom, and financial freedom exert a strongly negative effect, while the influence of monetary freedom is ambiguous; and (iii) There is an existence of not only random intercepts but also random coefficients at the country level impacting the model outcome. The empirical outcome could be of major importance for more efficient corruption controlling in emerging countries, including ASEAN nations.

Highlights

  • Economic growth is greatly dependent on institutions and institutional quality (North1990)

  • This study investigates the impact of economic freedom on the level of corruption in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries during the period 1999–2018

  • The results show that the extent of the macro-effects on the measures of economic freedom for corruption is identified by the degree of economic development of a country

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Economic growth is greatly dependent on institutions and institutional quality (North1990). Economic growth is greatly dependent on institutions and institutional quality The prosperity of developed countries (e.g., OECD or the United States) is originated from their excellent institutional quality. Acemoglu et al (2003) state that the institutional arrangement is a vital determinant of social and political development. Education, and infrastructure in developed countries are the dream of residents in poor or developing countries. Changes in an institutional system take place slowly and difficultly (Dias and Tebaldi 2012; Glaeser et al 2004). In developing countries, civil war and rampant corruption lead to depleting the beliefs of residents to their governments. Obstfeld (1994), Acemoglu and Zilibotti (1997) suggest that economic freedom and integration is a considerable solution for emerging countries

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call