Abstract
78 Background: 4 cycles ofAC chemotherapy are given as a component of several important and widely used chemotherapy regimens in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. We queried whether the use of dose-dense (every 2 week) AC chemotherapy is associated with a lower rate of hospitalization and resource utilization in clinical practice. Methods: We identified patients with early stage breast cancer treated with 3-weekly AC chemotherapy in a single institution. Cases were matched to controls by year of diagnosis and age. Rates of hospitalization during AC chemotherapy as well as duration of hospitalization, associated costs and use of pegfilgrastim were compared between the two groups. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical variables, and paired t-test was used to compare continuous variables. Results: 26 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 56 in both groups. As expected, rates of growth factor support with pegfilgrastim were higher in the dose dense versus 3-weekly group (52 versus 23 cycles, 2-tailed p = 0.0003). There was no difference in the likelihood of hospitalization among patients treated with dose dense versus 3-weekly AC (Fisher's exact test, p-value = 1.00). There was no difference in the mean duration of hospitalization between groups (mean 2.31 versus 1.23 days, 2-tailed p = 0.3352).Costs pertaining to pegfilgrastim use and hospitalization will be compared. Conclusions: In this clinical setting, dose dense administration of AC was not associated with lower rates or mean duration of hospitalization.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have