Impact of atopic dermatitis lesion locations and extent on patient burden: A real‐world study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAtopic dermatitis (AD) is associated with patient burden, but few studies describe the anatomic distribution of the disease or the impact of number of lesion locations.ObjectivesTo describe lesion locations and assess the relationship between the number of lesion locations (disease extent) and disease burden in patients with AD.MethodsThis cross‐sectional study included adults with dermatologist‐ or dermatology practitioner‐diagnosed AD enroled in the CorEvitas AD Registry (2020–2021) who initiated systemic therapy within 12 months prior to or at enrolment or had moderate‐to‐severe AD (vIGA‐AD® ≥3 and EASI ≥12) at enrolment. Thirteen areas of lesion involvement were assessed using a body map, and numbers of lesion locations were categorised as: 0, 1, 2–3, 4–6 and ≥7. Demographics, disease characteristics, PROs by number of lesion locations were descriptively compared using effect sizes (ES). The ES thresholds for small, medium, and large differences, respectively, were 0.10, 0.30, and 0.50 for phi (categorical outcomes) and 0.10, 0.25 and 0.40 for Cohen's f (continuous outcomes).ResultsAmong 1211 patients, lesion involvement was most frequent on the arms (69.5%) and lower limbs (61.7%). A total of 10.6%, 9.3%, 20.1%, 26.3% and 33.8% of patients had 0, 1, 2–3, 4–6 and ≥7 lesion locations, respectively. Current use of systemic (≥81.2%) and topical ( ≥74.7%) therapies was common, irrespective of lesion location. Disease severity increased with number of lesion locations: mean total BSA (ES = 1.17), EASI (ES = 1.11), and SCORAD (ES = 1.21). vIGA‐AD ≥3 was observed in 28.3%, 45.3%, 78.0%, and 93.9% of patients with 1, 2–3, 4–6 and ≥7 locations, respectively (ES = 0.63). Greater number of lesion locations was associated with worse PROs: mean POEM (ES = 0.57), sleep loss (ES = 0.41), peak pruritus (ES = 0.50), DLQI (ES = 0.40), and ADCT (ES = 0.53). Uncontrolled AD (ADCT ≥7) was observed in 48.2%, 52.9%, 70.4%, 81.6% of patients with 1, 2–3, 4–6 and ≥7 locations, respectively (ES = 0.42).ConclusionsAD lesions were reported for each body area assessed. Greater number of lesion locations was associated with increased disease severity, poor disease control, and decreased quality of life. Patients experienced substantial disease burden regardless of number of lesion locations involved.