Abstract

BackgroundLeft ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is the most widely used parameter for clinical decision-making, but reproducibility and accuracy problems remain. We evaluated the usefulness of a novel training program based on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging to obtain more reliable values of 2DE-derived LVEF and LV volumes.MethodsFifty-four sonographers from five hospitals independently measured LV volumes and LVEF using the same 2DE images from 15 patients who underwent CMR and 2DE. After receiving a lecture from an expert on how to properly trace the LV endocardium, each sonographer voluntary performed the measurements using the same datasets, and was invited to perform the same analysis for additional patients. The effect of the training intervention was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV) and coverage probability (CP).ResultsBefore the intervention, the LV volumes were significantly underestimated and the LVEF was significantly overestimated compared to the CMR results; however, these differences were reduced after the intervention. In particular, the CP (0.52 vs. 0.76, p < 0.001) for the LVEF showed significant improvement. However, the degree of improvement differed among institutions, and the CV actually became worse in two hospitals after the intervention. Level of experience and self-practice was associated with the reproducibility after the intervention.ConclusionsA training program using CMR as a reference improved the accuracy of 2DE-determined LV measurements. Since the degree of improvements differed among hospitals, individualization of training programs and periodical objective evaluation may be required to reduce inter-institutional variability.

Highlights

  • Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is the most widely used parameter for clinical decision-making, but reproducibility and accuracy problems remain

  • The reproducibility of LV volume measurements remains a serious concern due to the fact that manual tracing of the LV endocardial border using two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) produces non-negligible measurement variability [7]

  • The American Society of Echocardiography recommends the annual assessment of observer variability of Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) is the most widely used parameter for clinical decision-making, but reproducibility and accuracy problems remain. Assessing the left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) is one of the most common reasons to perform echocardiography. The potential solutions to resolve this problem are to (1) use fully automated LV quantification software or (2) establish a training program to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements. The former approach is more robust and straightforward, it requires specific equipment that cannot be used in routine echocardiographic laboratories

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call