Abstract

The around-the-clock presence of an in-house attending critical care physician (24/7 coverage) is purported to be associated with improved outcomes among high-risk children with critical illness. To evaluate the association of 24/7 in-house coverage with outcomes in children with critical illness. Patients younger than 18 years of age in the Virtual Pediatric Systems Database (2009-2014) were included. The main analysis was performed using generalized linear mixed effects multivariable regression models. In addition, multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of our findings. A total of 455,607 patients from 125 hospitals were included (24/7 group: 266,319 patients; no 24/7 group: 189,288 patients). After adjusting for patient and center characteristics, the 24/7 group was associated with lower mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) (24/7 vs. no 24/7; odds ratio [OR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.80; P = 0.002), a lower incidence of cardiac arrest (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.99; P = 0.04), lower mortality after cardiac arrest (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.340-0.93; P = 0.02), a shorter ICU stay (mean difference, -0.51 d; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.09), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference, -0.68 d; 95% CI, -1.23 to -0.14). In this large observational study, we demonstrated that pediatric critical care provided in the ICUs staffed with a 24/7 intensivist presence is associated with improved overall patient survival and survival after cardiac arrest compared with patients treated in ICUs staffed with discretionary attending coverage. However, results from a few sensitivity analyses leave some ambiguity in these results.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call