Abstract
Fifty-three breast lesions, which had been fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin, were immunohistochemically analyzed with monoclonal antibodies to cytokeratin subtypes 1, 5, 10, 14 (34BE12), muscle-specific actins (HHF35) and antiserum to S100 protein, all of which have been used as markers for myoepithelial cells. With these antibodies, a continuous myoepithelial cell layer could generally be seen around the benign ducts and acini. In in situ carcinomas, such a layer could still be observed, though it was usually discontinuous and sometimes absent. In infiltrating carcinomas, no myoepithelial cell layer could be observed. In intraductal hyperplasias, scattered HHF35, 34BE12 and S100-positive cells could be seen amongst the proliferating intraductal cells. In in situ and infiltrating carcinomas, however, such cells could also be observed. This was seen especially with antibodies 34BE12 and S100, and to a lesser extent also with HHF35. Morphologically these cells seemed to belong to the malignant cell population. Although myoepithelial cell preservation is an important morphological parameter in the histological evaluation of breast lesions, the results suggest that the myoepithelial cell markers 34BE12, HHF35 and S100 cannot be used in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions in a straightforward manner. This is because in situ carcinomas have a more or less preserved myoepithelial cell layer, and because many infiltrating and in situ carcinomas contain a subpopulation of neoplastic cells expressing these markers, possibly signifying myoepithelial cell differentiation.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have