Abstract

The so-called immune checkpoints are pathways that regulate the timing and intensity of the immune response to avoid an excessive reaction and to protect the host from autoimmunity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are designed to target the negative regulatory pathways of T cells, and they have been shown to restore anti-tumor immune functions and achieve considerable clinical results. Indeed, several clinical trials have reported durable clinical response in different tumor types, such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, after the initial enthusiasm, it is now evident that the majority of patients do not benefit from ICIs, due to innate or acquired tumor resistance. It is therefore mandatory to find ways to identify those patients who will respond and to find ways to induce response in those who at present do not benefit from ICIs. In this regard, the expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on neoplastic cells was the first, and most obvious, biomarker exploited to predict the activity of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) and/or anti-PD-L1 antibodies. As expected, a correlation was confirmed between the levels of PD-L1 and the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma, NSCLC and RCC. However, further results from clinical trials showed that some patients display a clinical response regardless of tumor cell PD-L1 expression levels, while others do not benefit from ICI treatment despite the expression of PD-L1 on neoplastic elements. These findings strongly support the notion that other factors may be relevant for the efficacy of ICI-based treatment regimens. Furthermore, although the current dogma indicates that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis exerts its regulatory effects via the signal transduced in PD-1-expressing T cells, recent evidence suggests that a reverse signaling may also exist downstream of PD-L1 in both tumor and immune cells. The reverse signaling of PD-L1, but also of other immune checkpoints, might contribute to the pro-tumoral/immune suppressive environment associated with tumor development and progression. Clarifying this aspect could facilitate the prediction of patients’ clinical outcomes, which are so far unpredictable and result in response, resistance or even hyper-progressive disease in some cases.

Highlights

  • The tumor microenvironment (TME) represents the main site where neoplastic and immune system cells interact

  • These cells include CD4 FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs); all these subsets are capable of inhibiting effector T cell anti-tumor immune response, with different

  • This review, beyond summarizing the major features of immune checkpoints, details the new evidence supporting the existence of a reverse signaling cascade mediated by immune checkpoint ligands, in particular programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), and discusses whether this signaling may contribute to the final outcome of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment and/or potentially explain unexpected clinical results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The tumor microenvironment (TME) represents the main site where neoplastic and immune system cells interact. The in-depth study of the TME has revealed some of the basis for such “adverse” interaction, identifying the different immune cell subsets present at the tumor site that are responsible for the local, and likely systemic, immune suppressive state. Pioneering work from Jim Allison and co-workers in the mid-1990s showed that antibodies blocking CTLA-4 were able to enhance the anti-tumor immune response in mice, resulting in complete tumor rejection and long-lasting immunity [2]. The inhibition of negative immune checkpoints, such as CTLA-4 and the PD-1 axis, is at the forefront of immunotherapeutic approaches for several types of cancers Their blockade has elicited durable anti-tumor responses and long-term remission in a number of patients with different types of neoplasia [3]. This review, beyond summarizing the major features of immune checkpoints, details the new evidence supporting the existence of a reverse signaling cascade mediated by immune checkpoint ligands, in particular PD-L1, and discusses whether this signaling may contribute to the final outcome of ICI treatment and/or potentially explain unexpected clinical results

One- and Two-Way Immune Checkpoints
Starting from the Beginning
Immune Checkpoint Blockade: A Great Clinical Success with a Few “Buts”
When the Treatment Makes Things Worse
PD-L1 Reverse Signaling in Tumor Cells
PD-L1 Reverse Signaling in Immune Cells
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.