Imbalance and dizziness caused by unilateral vestibular schwannomas correlate with vestibulo-ocular reflex precision and bias.

Abstract

Imbalance and dizziness are disabling symptoms for many patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS) but symptom severity typically does not correlate with the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) amplitude-based metrics used to assess peripheral vestibular damage. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that imbalance and dizziness in patients with VS relate to VOR metrics that are not based on response amplitude. Twenty-four patients with unilateral, sporadic VS tumors were studied, and objective (balance) and subjective (dizziness) vestibular dysfunction was quantified. The VOR was tested using two yaw-axis motion stimuli, low-frequency en-bloc sinusoidal, and high-frequency head-on-body impulsive rotations. Imbalance correlated with VOR precision (the inverse of the trial-to-trial variability) and with low-frequency VOR dynamics (quantified with the time constant), and these two metrics were also strongly correlated. Dizziness correlated with the VOR bias caused by an imbalance in static central vestibular tone, but not with dynamic VOR metrics. VOR accuracy (mean response amplitude relative to the ideal response) was not correlated with the severity of imbalance or dizziness or with measures of VOR precision or time constant. Imbalance in patients with VS, therefore, scales with VOR precision and time constant, both of which appear to reflect the central vestibular signal-to-noise ratio, but not with VOR slow-phase accuracy, which is based on the magnitude of the central vestibular signals. Dizziness was related to the presence of a static central tone imbalance but not to any VOR metrics, suggesting that abnormal perception in VS may be affected by factors that are not captured by yaw-axis VOR measurements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The severity of symptoms associated with unilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) is poorly correlated with standard yaw-axis vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) metrics that are based on response amplitude. In this study, we show that the balance and perceptual dysfunction experienced by patients with VS scales with VOR metrics that capture information about the central signal-to-noise ratio (balance) and central static tone (dizziness), but are not correlated with the VOR gain, which reflects central signal amplitude.