Abstract

Imagery is viewed as a hidden linguistic-stylistic category of a scientific text, the explication of which depends on the characteristics of the individual speech culture and the time of understanding the problem. The connection between scientific thinking and the figurativeness of the text is shown. It was determined that the imagery of a scientific text, in contrast to an artistic one, is not associated with the reproductive register of speech, it is formed by two linguistic and stylistic categories: the image of the subject of knowledge and, according to Yu. V. Rozhdestvensky, “the image of a scientific subject”. It is noted that scientific phraseology is formed in the same ways as poetic, but functionally different from it. The method of descriptive analysis revealed the associative and metaphorical fields of the key terms for linguistics. It has been established that scientific thinking is based on images of language-movement, language-space and language-social phenomenon. The authors believe that an appeal to related disciplines (linguistic personalology and the history of philology) makes it possible to develop fragments of a common scientific picture of the world at a certain historical stage, and to see the nature of their changes during the period of scientific paradigms change. The idea of the reproducibility of an image not as a “decoration” of speech, but a means of “figurative cohesion” (I. R. Galperin), a way of storing and transmitting information is fundamentally important in the article. The conclusion that the figurative paradigmatics influences the formation of the linguistic personality of the scientist-philologist is made.

Highlights

  • 1950—1960-е годы — это время споров о глобальном понятии системыязыка (лексической, грамматической, стилистической), когда исследователи могли уже свободно возвращаться к плодотворным идеям Московского лингвистического кружка 20-х годов

  • 1950—1960-е годы — это время споров о глобальном понятии системыязыка, когда исследователи могли уже свободно возвращаться к плодотворным идеям Московского лингвистического кружка 20-х годов

  • Об образе научного предмета Имплицированный метафорический план текста не только отражает индивидуальный или обобщенный стиль мышления, но и формирует так

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1950—1960-е годы — это время споров о глобальном понятии системыязыка (лексической, грамматической, стилистической), когда исследователи могли уже свободно возвращаться к плодотворным идеям Московского лингвистического кружка 20-х годов. Прежде всего это были проблемы возникновения русского языка, содержания стилистики и языка художественной литературы как научных дисциплин, фразеологии, синтаксиса, формального метода в лингвистике, структурализма.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.