Abstract
Echocardiography is an essential element for accurate and timely diagnosis of cardiac pathology. In this context, ultrasound enhancing agents (UEAs), are often essential for visualizing endocardial borders,1 evaluating myocardial perfusion, characterizing intracardiac masses, and other applications. Although UEAs have been shown to be safe, rare serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported. It is in this context that De La Fuente Gonzalez et al performed a systematic review evaluating randomized and observational data comparing the safety of UEA brands from 2018-2023. The authors conclude that “Optison reduces risk of serious adverse events vs. Definity/Lumason.” However, the data presented do not support such a conclusion, as will be discussed in this editorial. What can be concluded is that UEAs as a class are extremely safe with very rare SAEs. The use of UEAs during echocardiography are encouraged per guideline-directed indications based upon evidence-based reduction of misdiagnosis and duplicative testing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.