Abstract
Introduction Part I. Five Common Objections to Human Reproductive Cloning Reflect, Reinforce, and Inspire Stereotypes about Human Clones: 1. Does human reproductive cloning offend God and nature? 2. Should children be begotten and not made? 3. Do human clones lack individuality? 4. Could human clones destroy humanity? 5. Does human reproductive cloning harm participants and produce children with birth defects? Part II. Anti-Cloning Laws Are Bad Public Policy: 6. What anti-cloning laws say and do 7. The five objections have inspired anti-cloning laws 8. Anti-cloning laws reflect a policy of existential segregation 9. The costs of anti-cloning laws outweigh their benefits Part III. Anti-Cloning Laws Violate the Equal Protection Guarantee and Are Unconstitutional: 10. Anti-cloning laws classify human clones and are subject to strict scrutiny 11. Anti-cloning laws inflict judicially cognizable injuries that confer standing 12. Anti-cloning laws violate the equal protection guarantee Conclusion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
