Abstract

BackgroundIFNγ-producing CD4+CD25+Foxp3+CD127- Treg represent the first line of Treg during an immune response. In the present study we determined whether IFNγ+ Treg in-vivo and in-vitro are Helios-positive representing activated natural (nTreg) or Helios-negative representing adaptive Treg (aTreg) and whether they originate from CD4+CD25+ and/or CD4+CD25- PBL. Furtheron, we investigated whether they are inducible by recombinant IFNγ (rIFNγ) as a single stimulus, decrease in-vitro after elimination of the stimulus, and have a demethylated Foxp3 Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) which is associated with stable Foxp3 expression.MethodSubsets of IFNγ+ Treg were determined in peripheral blood of healthy controls using eight-color flow cytometry and were further investigated in-vitro. Foxp3 TSDR methylation status was determined using bisulphite polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and high resolution melt (HRM) analysis.ResultsNearly all Treg in the peripheral blood were Helios+IFNγ- (1.9 ± 1.1/μl) and only few were Helios+IFNγ+ or Helios-IFNγ+ Treg (both 0.1 ± 0.1/μl). Enriched IFNγ+ Treg subsets showed in part strong Foxp3 TSDR demethylation. In-vitro, rIFNγ was unable to induce Treg. CD4+CD25+ enriched PBL stimulated with PMA/Ionomycin in the presence of rIFNγ were rather resistant to the effect of rIFNγ, in contrast to CD4+CD25- enriched PBL which showed increasing total Treg with Helios+ Treg switching from IFNγ- to IFNγ+ and increasing Helios-IFNγ+ Treg. The data indicate that rIFNγ, in combination with a polyclonal stimulus, activates nTreg and induces aTreg. When phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)/Ionomycin was washed out from the cell culture after 6 h stimulation, Treg induction continued for at least 96 h of cell culture, contradicting the hypothesis that removal of the stimulus results in significant decrease of IFNγ- and IFNγ+ CD4+CD25+Foxp3+CD127- Treg due to loss of Foxp3 expression.ConclusionsIFNγ+Helios- aTreg as well as IFNγ+Helios+ nTreg are detectable in the blood of healthy individuals, show in part strong Foxp3 TSDR demethylation and are inducible in-vitro. The present data provide further insight concerning the in-vivo and in-vitro characteristics of IFNγ+ Treg and help to understand their role in immunoregulation. Alloantigen-specific demethylated IFNγ+Helios+ nTreg might represent a suitable marker for monitoring graft-specific immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients.

Highlights

  • IFNγ-producing CD4+CD25+Foxp3+CD127- T regulator cells (Treg) represent the first line of Treg during an immune response

  • CD4+CD25+ enriched peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)/Ionomycin in the presence of recombinant IFNγ (rIFNγ) were rather resistant to the effect of rIFNγ, in contrast to CD4+CD25- enriched PBL which showed increasing total Treg with Helios+ Treg switching from IFNγ- to IFNγ+ and increasing Helios-IFNγ+ Treg

  • IFNγ+Helios- adaptive Treg (aTreg) as well as IFNγ+Helios+ Natural T regulator cell (nTreg) are detectable in the blood of healthy individuals, show in part strong Foxp3 Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR) demethylation and are inducible in-vitro

Read more

Summary

Introduction

IFNγ-producing CD4+CD25+Foxp3+CD127- Treg represent the first line of Treg during an immune response. IFNγ+ Treg are detectable in the blood of renal transplant recipients with good long-term graft function and in patients with autoimmune disease, such as type-1 diabetes and multiple sclerosis [2,3,4] They co-express IFNγ receptors on the cell surface and are inducible by IFNγ (auto- and paracrine activation) [5, 6]. Patients with poor long-term allograft function after renal transplantation are able to form CD4 +CD25+Foxp3+IFNγ+ PBL in MLC with pretransplant obtained peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) [8]. Posttransplant these patients showed lower frequencies of these cells in the periphery than renal transplant recipients with good long-term graft outcome [2]. The in-vitro behavior of IFNγ+CD4+CD25+Foxp3+CD127- Treg suggests that they form the first line of Treg, patrolling in the body and searching for IFNγ and initial immune responses that they subsequently suppress

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call