Abstract

The main content of this article is to describe “climate finance” and “green finance” in detail, as implemented by International Financial Institutions (IFIs) and their pertinent environmental and social project quality criteria. The approach of this article is to perceive and understand environment-related activities of international financial institutions (IFIs) as part of a societal learning process, and consequently to describe their “environmental and social project quality criteria” as an expression of such ongoing societal learning processes. What can our readership, related to global finance, profit from such a comparison? Against the expectation of many, IFIs already implemented efficient rules for redirecting global funds to climate and environmental projects — and have thus performed a successful “act of societal learning”. The “environmental and social project quality criteria” have played a crucial role in convincing economic and administrative actors (i. e., learners in our context) to behave in a climatecompatible manner. Thus, the lesson can be drawn from the domain of “societal learning” to the domain of “individual learning” that clear and transparent criteria sets are decisive for a rule-based societal transformation. This article shows that a criteriabased selection process provides the best results for long-term societal interest; in this case climate protection.

Highlights

  • The lesson can be drawn from the domain of “societal learning” to the domain of “individual learning” that clear and transparent criteria sets are decisive for a rule-based societal transformation

  • ФИНАНСЫ: ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА Т. 25, No 6’2021 financetp.f a.r u. What can this volume’s readership, likely to be related to higher education and lifelong learning, profit from such a comparison? Against the author’s initial expectation, International Financial Institutions (IFIs) are starting to become efficient at redirecting global funds to climate and environmental projects — and have performed a successful “act of societal learning” [46, 47]

  • Infrastructure projects proposed to IFIs are the target of informing actors and stakeholders urged to satisfy Quality Assurance criteria to improve such as governments and industry about options for their operations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The main content of this article is to describe “climate finance” and “green finance” actions [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] to allow for innovation and growth [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] Such green financing is undertaken by International Financial Institutions (IFIs) and their pertinent and relevant environmental and social project quality criteria in great detail. The notion of global change extends into social spheres, both regarding driving factors (patterns of energy use and land use) and regarding effects (climate-induced migration, including resulting political instabilities) [30, 43]

Ahamer
Background
IFIs’ social and environmental project award criteria
AIIB focus areas and environmental standards AIIB’s 22 focus areas are:
Evaluation of IFIs against this article’s quality criteria
10. Stakeholder engagement
Special Circumstances
Information Disclosure
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call