Abstract

Contrary to conventional wisdom and previous research, this article finds little evidence that presidential primary voters are ideologically unrepresentative. In drawing this conclusion, two assertions are made. First, the article argues the appropriate comparison group for primary voters is general election voters who fail to vote in primaries, not all primary nonvoters. The latter group includes habitual nonvoters whose differences from primary voters would be attributable not to the primary process but to general patterns of participation in the United States. Second, the article argues ideology must be defined as more than extremism. Ideology can be construed as a sophisticated belief system or a psychological identification. Only on these latter two definitions do a few minor differences arise between presidential primary voters and general election voters.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.