Abstract

e17507 Background: Small non-coding RNAs (sncRNAs) that control post-transcriptional gene expression are attractive candidate molecular targets for cancer screening tests. We evaluated whether sncRNAs expression are markedly different in benign, precancerous, and cancerous cervical tissue. Methods: We examined the expression of six sncRNA species: circular RNAs (circRNAs) microRNAs (miRNAs), piwi-interacting RNA (piRNAs), small nuclear RNA (snRNAs), small nucleolar RNA (snoRNAs), and transfer RNA (tRNA), from archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cervical specimen obtained from 172 women (74 benign, 58 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and 40 invasive cervical cancer). We used DESeq2 to identify differentially expressed sncRNA molecules with adjusted p-value < 0.05 and at least 2-fold up- or down-regulation. Results: Comparing benign to HSIL samples, we foundseveral statistically significant, differentially expressed sncRNAs: 906 circRNAs (*circ_0066810, p=3.76x10-16), 87 miRNAs (*miR-149-5p, p=1.30x10-14), 11 piRNAs (*piR_016945, p=8.32x10-13), 32 snRNAs (*RNU1-17P, p=1.90x10-10), 5 snoRNAs (*SCARNA18, p=1.35x10-5), and 24 tRNA (*tRNA-Glu-TTC-8-1, p=6.45x10-17). Comparing benign to invasive cervical cancer samples, we also foundseveral statistically significant, differentially expressed sncRNAs: 3,192 circRNAs (*circ_0123115, p=7.46x10-50), 325 miRNAs (*miR-7-5p, p=6.72x10-36), 82 piRNAs (*piR-hsa-27513, p=1.44x10-15), 71 snRNAs (*RNU1-20P, p=1.37x10-45), 52 snoRNAs (*SNORD95, p=1.68x10-23), and 68 tRNA (*tRNA-Cys-GCA-9-3, p=1.01x10-21). * Indicates the sncRNA with the smallest p-value, for each specie. Conclusions: Our results identify sncRNAs with potential utility of as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers, and therapeutic targets for cervical precancer and cancer.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call