Abstract
To identify early symptoms and changes in QoL among men with primary localized prostate cancer (PC) who later develop metastases. From an ongoing prospective study of 3.885 men with localized PC, primarily treated with radiotherapy (RT), a subsample of men developing metastatic PC (mPC) following the first year after the start of RT and that had died during the follow-up (mPC group, n = 107) were matched against men who did not develop metastases (non-mPC group, n = 214). Data were collected using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and PCSS instruments. Non-parametric tests were performed for comparisons at baseline, end of RT, 3 months, and 1, 2, 3, and 5 years after RT. The final sample consists of 317 men (mPC n = 106; non-mPC n = 211) who had completed at least one questionnaire. Initially, symptom levels were generally low and QoL and functioning high in both groups. An increasing difference between the groups was found, where the mPC group gradually deteriorated from the 2-year follow-up. Significant differences were found for several outcomes at 3 and 5 years. In a sensitivity analysis, where metastatic patients were removed from the time-point of verified metastases, most differences did not remain significant. Significant deterioration over time was seen within both groups for some outcomes. The results indicate that unmet supportive needs occur over time among these men. Worsening QoL or functioning and symptoms may be difficult to recognize when the development is gradual over several years, and with various access to systematic follow-up in late phases. This highlights the need for continuous monitoring of PC patients to detect needs for supportive interventions early and throughout the disease course, also among those with non-metastatic disease who have undergone curatively intended treatment.
Highlights
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer in men (Bray et al, 2018), and in Sweden the most common cancer overall, with over 10,000 diagnosed in 2019 (National Board of Health and Welfare, 2021)
For prostate-specific symptoms, a significant difference was observed at the 3-year follow-up — where the metastatic PC (mPC) group rated their sexual problems as significantly worse than the non-mPC group ( p = 0.006)
Even if the results show that the development of metastases could not be predicted by worsening patient-reported outcome scores, it does indicate that once metastases occur among men with prostate cancer (PC), close monitoring of symptoms, functioning, and QoL may serve to identify patients who develop needs for support and intervention against severe or debilitating problems
Summary
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer in men (Bray et al, 2018), and in Sweden the most common cancer overall, with over 10,000 diagnosed in 2019 (National Board of Health and Welfare, 2021). Most men are diagnosed with localized disease (tumor stages T1–T2), meaning the tumor has not metastasized (Litwin and Tan, 2017). There are several treatments available for men with localized PC: surgical removal of the prostatic gland (prostatectomy), radiotherapy (RT), or active surveillance, which means that the PC is being regularly monitored and other treatments might be considered if the disease progresses further (Barocas et al, 2017). A study comparing patient-reported outcomes between men with local disease (tumor stages 1–2) and men with tumor stages 3 and 4 found that even though the group with more advanced cancer reported more problems with fatigue and hormonal function (due to hormone treatment), health-related QoL (HRQoL) did not differ substantially between the groups (Downing et al, 2019). HRQoL is rapidly deteriorating as the disease reaches the more advanced stages of metastatic disease
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.