Abstract
IntroductionAdvances in the testing and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring oncogenic drivers have improved outcomes. Little is known about testing and treatment patterns in diverse patient populations. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study in a diverse cohort of patients treated in the John Peter Smith safety net healthcare system. We determined patterns of blood- and tissue-based testing and treatment of patients with EGFR and ALK alterations. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to assess the impact of EGFR and ALK testing. ResultsA total of 220 patients were included, 97 (44%) were non-Hispanic White, 72 (33%) were Black, 28 (13%) were Hispanic, and 23 (10%) were Asian. EGFR and ALK testing increased over time from 55% and 52%, respectively, in 2017 to 87% and 82%, respectively, in 2021. Frequency of EGFR alterations were highest in Asian patients (45%) and comparable among other groups (6-13%). Frequency of ALK alterations were highest in Hispanic (13%), and Asian (11%) patients, and were 2% for both Black and non-Hispanic White patients. In a multivariate model, lack of testing was associated with worse survival (aHR 1.6; P = .003) and testing positive for EGFR (aHR 0.43; P = .01) or ALK (aHR 0.28; P = .04) was associated with improved survival. Race and ethnicity were not associated with survival differences. ConclusionAs molecular testing for oncogenic mutations in NSCLC increases, druggable alterations such as ALK and EGFR can be identified in all race-ethnicity groups and are associated with improved outcomes.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call