Abstract

Recent in vitro studies reported the exceptional ability of some bacterial species to form biofilm-like aggregates in human and animal synovial fluids (SF), but evidences from infected clinical samples are still lacking. In this study, we investigated whether this bacterial phenotype was present in infected SFs collected from joint infections and if it was maintained in in vitro settings. SFs sent for culture to the Laboratory of Microbiology of our institute were directly analyzed by means of confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and the infective agents were isolated for further in vitro tests. Moreover, sterile SF was collected from patients who did not receive previous antibiotic therapy to investigate the formation of bacterial aggregates, together with biofilm and matrix production on a titanium surface. Finally, antibiotic susceptibility studies were performed by using bovine SF. Four Staphylococcus aureus, one Staphylococcus lugdunensis, and one Prevotella bivia strain were identified in the infected SFs. The CLSM analysis showed that all staphylococci were present as a mixture of single cells and bacterial clumps surrounded by an exopolymeric substance, which comprised SF-derived fibrin, while all P. bivia cells appeared separated. Despite that, differences in the ability to aggregate between S. aureus and S. lugdunensis were observed in clinical SFs. These different phenotypes were further confirmed by in vitro growth, even though the application of such ex vivo approach lead all staphylococci to form exceptionally large microbial aggregates, which are several folds bigger than those observed in clinical samples. Planktonic aggregates challenged for antibiotic susceptibility revealed a sharp increase of recalcitrance to the treatments. Although this is still at a preliminary stage, the present work confirmed the ability of staphylococci to form free-floating biofilm-like aggregates in infected SF from patients with joint infections. Furthermore, the obtained results pointed out that future in vitro research on joint infections will benefit from the use of human- or animal-derived SF. Even though this approach should be carefully validated in further studies comprising a larger microbial population, these findings pose new challenges in the treatment of infected native and prosthetic joints and for the approach to new investigations.

Highlights

  • The analysis of synovial fluid (SF) has long been recommended as a routine procedure in the diagnosis of joint infections

  • S. aureus 1 and 4 and S. lugdunensis were isolated in the SF of patients with prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), while S. aureus 2 and 3 and P. bivia were from native joint infections

  • The obtained results provided evidence that staphylococci are able to form biofilm-like planktonic aggregates in both native and prosthetic infected joints, with the clumps closely resembling their sessile counterparts and able to efficiently scavenge host fibrin

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The analysis of synovial fluid (SF) has long been recommended as a routine procedure in the diagnosis of joint infections. Septic native joints are quite uncommon, with approximately two cases per 100,000 people per year (Ross, 2017), but this event may lead to joint damage and consequent disability. The presence of a prosthetic device drastically increases both the morbidity and the mortality of septic arthritis up to more than 3%, which accounts for almost a third of all the causes for implant revision (Beam and Osmon, 2018). The etiology of native and prosthetic joint infections differs. While in the first case Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for more than 50% of the cases, prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) see a very high incidence of low-virulence microorganisms, such as coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and anaerobes such as Cutibacterium acnes (Drago et al, 2017). Contrarily to isolated planktonic bacteria, they often fail to grow in standard culture conditions used in diagnostics (Costerton et al, 2011; Dastgheyb et al, 2015a)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.