Abstract

This paper argues that Iceland enjoyed essential shelter, for its development and prosperity, provided by Denmark and Britain. Societal relations with Copenhagen were of fundamental importance in the preservation and evolution of Icelandic identity and culture, providing the foundation of the modern society and leading to the establishment of the Icelandic state. Danish financial backups created the basis for the island’s economic prosperity in the 20th century. Moreover, Denmark provided partial political shelter in terms of significant diplomatic support in guaranteeing trade agreements with other states. Also, Denmark led by example and Iceland followed its foreign policy. On the other hand, Denmark failed to provide Iceland with protection of its land and waters and economic cover when it was in most need. Moreover, the economic cover it did provide was, at times, highly costly. Denmark had been downgraded to a small European power in the post-Napoleonic period. In practice, Britain was in control over the North Atlantic. It guaranteed Iceland’s neutrality and connection to the outside world and markets when the Danish authorities failed in these areas, as long as British interests were also served. Nor did British protection come without cost. Accordingly, this paper confirms the common claim of small-state studies that small states are at the mercy of their larger neighbours. Moreover, our findings indicate that Iceland’s growing autonomy did not affect its need for political, economic and societal cover.

Highlights

  • This paper is the fourth in a ‘hexalogy’ that examines Iceland’s foreign relations from the time of Settlement to the present day

  • The assumption has been taken further by the shelter theory which claims that small states/entities need political, economic and societal shelter provided by their larger neighbours and/or international organizations in order to prosper, domestically, and thrive in the international system (Thorhallsson 2011)

  • It was in need of political cover, in line with the shelter theory on the importance of military and diplomatic support and the significance of beneficial norms and rules of the international system for small entities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper is the fourth in a ‘hexalogy’ (a series of six) that examines Iceland’s foreign relations from the time of Settlement to the present day. 1400 to the Reformation in the mid-16th century) and the first part of the ‘Danish Period’ until the end of the Napoleonic era (see Þórhallsson 2012; Þórhallsson & Kristinsson 2013; Þórhallsson & Joensen 2014) These studies build on an assumption from the International Relations literature that small states/entities are uniquely vulnerable, economically and politically. The assumption has been taken further by the shelter theory which claims that small states/entities need political, economic and societal shelter provided by their larger neighbours and/or international organizations in order to prosper, domestically, and thrive in the international system (Thorhallsson 2011) The aim of these studies is to examine whether the expectations of shelter theory address the reality of Iceland’s external relations through history. The concluding part will summarize the main findings of the paper

Economic shelter
Political shelter
Societal shelter
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call