Abstract

Human decisions are often influenced by others' opinions. This process is regulated by social norms: for instance, we tend to reciprocate the consideration received from others, independently of their reliability as information sources. Nonetheless, no study to date has investigated whether and how reciprocity modulates social influence in child–adult interaction. We tested 6-, 8- and 10-year-old children in a novel joint perceptual task. A child and an adult experimenter made perceptual estimates and then took turns in making a final decision, choosing between their own and partner's response. We manipulated the final choices of the adult partner, who in one condition chose often the child's estimates, whereas in another condition tended to confirm her own response. Results reveal that 10-year-old children reciprocated the consideration received from the partner, increasing their level of conformity to the adult's judgements when the partner had shown high consideration towards them. At the same time, 10-year-old children employed more elaborate decision criteria in choosing when trusting the adult partner compared to younger children and did not show egocentric biases in their final decisions. Our results shed light on the development of the cognitive and normative mechanisms modulating reciprocal social influence in child–adult interaction.

Highlights

  • Humans often take advice and learn from others to optimize behaviour and decisions

  • We analysed developmental differences in the amount of social influence exerted by the adult partner on children in the Reciprocal social influence task, independently of the experimental condition

  • No study to date investigated the developmental features of reciprocal social influence in child–adult interaction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Humans often take advice and learn from others to optimize behaviour and decisions. Several studies have shown that humans can effectively recognize when the information provided by peers is reliable and should be used to guide behaviour [9,10,11,12]. They use information about informants’ confidence [13,14] and royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.