Abstract
There is controversy in the courts about the admissibility of statements by victims, eyewitnesses, and defendants following hypnosis. The scientific community has strongly influenced many court decisions about credibility, reliability, and admissibility of memory retrieval where hypnosis is used. The author presents two case histories of defendants whose memories were refreshed by hypnosis. He presents current court rulings on the use of hypnosis and discusses their impact on laboratory data involving memory and reliability.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
