Abstract

Remote sensing of vegetation stress has been posed as a possible large area monitoring tool for surface CO2 leakage from geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) sites since vegetation is adversely affected by elevated CO2 levels in soil. However, the extent to which remote sensing could be used for CO2 leak detection depends on the spectral separability of the plant stress signal caused by various factors, including elevated soil CO2 and water stress. This distinction is crucial to determining the seasonality and appropriateness of remote GCS site monitoring. A greenhouse experiment tested the degree to which plants stressed by elevated soil CO2 could be distinguished from plants that were water stressed. A randomized block design assigned Alfalfa plants (Medicago sativa) to one of four possible treatment groups: 1) a CO2 injection group; 2) a water stress group; 3) an interaction group that was subjected to both water stress and CO2 injection; or 4) a group that received adequate water and no CO2 injection. Single date classification trees were developed to identify individual spectral bands that were significant in distinguishing between CO2 and water stress agents, in addition to a random forest classifier that was used to further understand and validate predictive accuracies. Overall peak classification accuracy was 90% (Kappa of 0.87) for the classification tree analysis and 83% (Kappa of 0.77) for the random forest classifier, demonstrating that vegetation stressed from an underground CO2 leak could be accurately discerned from healthy vegetation and areas of co-occurring water stressed vegetation at certain times. Plants appear to hit a stress threshold, however, that would render detection of a CO2 leak unlikely during severe drought conditions. Our findings suggest that early detection of a CO2 leak with an aerial or ground-based hyperspectral imaging system is possible and could be an important GCS monitoring tool.

Highlights

  • Geologic Carbon Sequestration Post-industrial atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has risen from 280 ppm to over 380 ppm [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • There is a mandate to monitor Geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) sites for CO2 leakage to ensure the efficacy of this technology, given that it is on the brink of commercial-scale deployment [14,19,20,21,22]

  • The water stress and CO2 injection (WSI) class predominantly exhibited higher reflectance in the visible and shortwave infrared (SWIR) regions compared to all other samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Geologic Carbon Sequestration Post-industrial atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has risen from 280 ppm to over 380 ppm [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Atmospheric CO2 absorbs and reemits radiation energy from the Earth’s surface causing a warming of the surface environment [7]. Geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) is a potential climate change mitigation strategy that captures point source CO2 emissions from industrial sources and stores them in large sub-surface reservoirs. Remote sensing is being investigated as a possible cost-effective, large-area monitoring method to detect surface CO2 leaks at GCS sites [23,24]. A leak from a GCS site would compromise the viability of this technology as a climate mitigation strategy, but it could threaten the safety of the surrounding environment and inhabitants at the surface. Natural sources of CO2 leakage from the Long Valley Caldera in California have caused extensive forest mortality [26,27,28]

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call