Abstract

Perturbed-angular-correlation studies of temperature-dependent hyperfine fields at $^{111}\mathrm{Cd}$ and $^{99}\mathrm{Ru}$ solutes in nickel above and below the Curie point are presented. Trends among observed hyperfine fields at solutes in Fe, Co, and Ni are discussed within the framework of a formal spin Hamiltonian. Origins of the hyperfine fields on $4f$ and $5p$ group solutes are discussed. Conduction-electron and core-polarization contributions to ${H}_{\mathrm{hf}}$ in transition-series solutes are analyzed, and localized moments are derived for the solutes Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, and Pt, and are compared with neutron-scattering results. The observed lack of agreement may be associated with the fact that neutron scattering and hyperfine fields measure different quantities. It is suggested that a molecular-field model that accounts for conduction electrons as well as core polarization might also be applicable above ${T}_{C}$. This model fits ${H}_{\mathrm{hf}}(T)$ in $^{55}\mathrm{Mn}\mathrm{Fe}$ for all spins between \textonehalf{} and $\frac{5}{2}$, suggesting that $j$ cannot be determined from ${H}_{\mathrm{hf}}(T)$ alone. This analysis yields a local moment of $(1.5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.5){\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$ for $^{55}\mathrm{Mn}$ in iron, just in agreement with the results of Jaccarino et al., but higher than allowed by neutron data. Angular-correlation apparatus capable of 0.1% accuracy is described. A localized moment of $\ensuremath{\cong}0.5{\ensuremath{\mu}}_{B}$ is determined from ${H}_{\mathrm{hf}}$ for $^{99}\mathrm{Ru}$ in Ni. For $T>{T}_{C}$, paramagnetic Knight shifts up to -80% are observed. A model due to Lovesey also fits the data below ${T}_{C}$ for $j=\frac{1}{2}$. For $^{111}\mathrm{Cd}\mathrm{Ni}$, no local moment is indicated below ${T}_{C}$, and comparison with a model due to Lovesey and Marshall suggests that Cd atoms have the same temperature-dependent magnetization as nearest-neighbor nickel atoms. Above ${T}_{C}$, paramagnetic Knight shifts up to -60% are in excellent agreement with predictions of the conduction-electron polarization model.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call