Abstract

Land use land cover (LULC) changes are highly pronounced in African countries, as they are characterized by an agriculture-based economy and a rapidly growing population. Understanding how land use/cover changes (LULCC) influence watershed hydrology will enable local governments and policymakers to formulate and implement effective and appropriate response strategies to minimize the undesirable effects of future land use/cover change or modification and sustain the local socio-economic situation. The hydrological response of the Ethiopia Fincha’a watershed to LULCC that happened during 25 years was investigated, comparing the situation in three reference years: 1994, 2004, and 2018. The information was derived from Landsat sensors, respectively Landsat 5 TM, Landsat 7 ETM, and Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS. The various LULC classes were derived via ArcGIS using a supervised classification system, and the accuracy assessment was done using confusion matrixes. For all the years investigated, the overall accuracies and the kappa coefficients were higher than 80%, with 2018 as the more accurate year. The analysis of LULCC revealed that forest decreased by 20.0% between the years 1994–2004, and it decreased by 11.8% in the following period 2004–2018. Such decline in areas covered by forest is correlated to an expansion of cultivated land by 16.4% and 10.81%, respectively. After having evaluated the LULCC at the basin scale, the watershed was divided into 18 sub-watersheds, which contained 176 hydrologic response units (HRUs), having a specific LULC. Accounting for such a detailed subdivision of the Fincha’a watershed, the SWAT model was firstly calibrated and validated on past data, and then applied to infer information on the hydrological response of each HRU on LULCC. The modelling results pointed out a general increase of average water flow, both during dry and wet periods, as a consequence of a shift of land coverage from forest and grass towards settlements and build-up areas. The present analysis pointed out the need of accounting for past and future LULCC in modelling the hydrological responses of rivers at the watershed scale.

Highlights

  • Hydrological modelling and water resource management are highly related to the processes of the hydrologic cycle [1]

  • This cycle can be affected by land use land cover (LULC) changes, as LULC are an essential component of the terrestrial ecosystem, and have been identified as a change driver worldwide [2]

  • The results reported here are in line with the recent work of Tolessa et al [53], who analysed the Fincha’a watershed LULC changes (LULCC) over the period 1987–2019, showing an increment of cultivated areas, settlement, waterbodies, and sugarcane plantation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hydrological modelling and water resource management are highly related to the processes of the hydrologic cycle [1]. LULCC are highly pronounced in developing countries, which are characterized by agriculture-based economies and rapidly increasing populations [18,19] In those countries, the impact of recent LULCC on biodiversity and human life is evident [20], as well as the need for better evaluating future trends and management strategies to counteract its negative effects. The degree of modification of the natural land cover by human influences, the intensity of the changes, and the location of the LULC within a catchment affect the extent to which the land use determines the hydrological response of a catchment Generally, these modifications are evaluated only at the local scale [23], involving difficulties in estimating the contribution of LULCC on the basin-wide hydrological cycle.

Study Area
Watershed
Weather Data
Average
Temperature
Rainfall
Soil Type
Spatial Data and Satellite Imagery
Digital Elevation Model
Landsat
Image Classification Process
Model Setup
Watershed Delineation
Hydrologic Response Units
Sensitivity Analysis
Calibration and Validation
Model Performance Evaluation
Land Use Land Cover Changes
Land Use Classification Accuracy
12. Simulated
Hydrological Response to LULCC Changes on Streamflow
Recommendations
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.